Tweet
Where do you stand on chemtrails? Just been down a Twitter conspiracy hole on them and I'm wondering if the Government spraying us with chemicals is a step too far for you or are you a believer?
-
-
Re: FAO Organ Morgan and co
Well Chemtrails over the Country Club is something worth listening too -
Re: FAO Organ Morgan and co
Originally posted by delmbox View Post
Not sure what this is but it’s regulated.Comment
-
Re: FAO Organ Morgan and co
Saudi Arabia made rain this year in three cities , “Cloud seeding”
Probably prevents droughts in arid countries?
Comment
-
Re: FAO Organ Morgan and co
I did look into the theories years back but was left undecided and more than a little bewildered by it all.
The most interesting one I thought was that it is indeed true and all governments have done so since the mid-1990s. Not as a covert population control measure to poison enough of them to keep typical life expectancy from going too high, but for a beneficent purpose... to help shield the world's population from the effects of a weakening magnetosphere and the increase in radiation.
Those that promote it say in late March or early April 2023, with March 23 the most forecasted date, the earth will suffer a catastrophic magnetic pole reversal. These reversals, they maintain, occur on average every 12,700 years.
It's said if and when it happens it will be so violent most people will die instantly as virtually every structure on the surface will collapse and for those outdoors who are standing will suffer broken legs at a minimum. Survivors would then have to contend with monster-sized tsunamis. All those not high enough above sea level will drown.
Further, the connected billionaires who are aware of what's inevitable believe they can survive it inside their underground cities that they have been constructing for decades. The largest of which is directly beneath Denver airport in Colorado, USA.Comment
-
Re: FAO Organ Morgan and co
Chemtrails should be the least of your worriesOriginally posted by delmbox View Post
Comment
-
Re: FAO Organ Morgan and co
china expanding its weather modification program
Comment
-
Re: FAO Organ Morgan and co
Oh I don't believe in it at all, I was just wondering what you guys thoughtOriginally posted by Wales-Bales View PostChemtrails should be the least of your worriesComment
-
Re: FAO Organ Morgan and co
Oh, so you were trolling. Good ladOriginally posted by delmbox View Post
Comment
-
Re: FAO Organ Morgan and co
You could be correct.Originally posted by delmbox View Post
Whether you are or not, I think you have too much faith in government. The British state has a long history of conducting undeclared experiments on its citizenry. I don't doubt some of them detailed in the articles below were dismissed as outlandish conspiracy theories when they were perfectly true.
Millions were in germ war tests - https://www.theguardian.com/politics...medicalscience
How British government carried out secret biological warfare tests on London Tube passengers in 1960s during Cold War - https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...-Cold-War.htmlComment
-
Re: FAO Organ Morgan and co
No I wasn't actually, I was genuinely curious because I think we come at things from very different perspectives and I don't know anyone else who might potentially believe in chemtrailsOriginally posted by Wales-Bales View PostOh, so you were trolling. Good ladComment
-
Re: FAO Organ Morgan and co
I have less faith in government than you think, I just think that planes leave vapour trails because of hot air from the engines mixing with the cold atmosphere.Originally posted by Organ Morgan. View Post
Also because (and this applies even more so to the moon landings) the amount of people that would have to be involved in a project like chemtrailing is so large there's absolutely no way it's feasible that it could be covered up for decadesComment
-
Re: FAO Organ Morgan and co
And, by an absolutely unbelievable coincidence, organ also thinks the moon landings are fake.Originally posted by delmbox View PostComment
-
Re: FAO Organ Morgan and co
Hold on, I thought I had provided all the information necessary in the Conspiracy Theory Ballon D'Or thread to demonstrate all six Moon missions between 1969-1972 were fake studio productions. I linked to a video with a NASA scientist stating man cannot travel more than 400 miles from the earth's surface because radiation at the first Van Allen belt will kill them. In that same video is Obama speaking in 2014 as the sitting president of the USA that getting a man farther than the lower orbit, 400 miles, cannot be done.
Yet characters like you still believe that beginning in 1969 man travelled 600 times farther than the lower orbit to 240 thousand miles away. Use what's between your ears, it'll make for a welcome change.Comment
-
Re: FAO Organ Morgan and co
This guy thinks he's resolved one of the most enduring conspiracy theories with a video he found on the net, and then calls everyone else deluded
I found Obama's quote. It's from a speech at the Kennedy Space Center in 2010 - not 2014, but that's a minor detail.
“Our goal is the capacity for people to work and learn, operate and live safely beyond the Earth for extended periods of time, ultimately in ways that are more sustainable and even indefinite.” He also said: “Early in the next decade, a set of crewed flights will test and prove the systems required for exploration beyond low-Earth orbit. And by 2025, we expect new spacecraft designed for long journeys to allow us to begin the first-ever crewed missions beyond the moon into deep space. We'll start by sending astronauts to an asteroid for the first time in history.”
Your video only contains the sentence in bold, which removes the context - humans not just making a quick visit outside of Low Earth Orbit, but being able to live there and using it as a base to explore deeper into space, past the moon (which is what deep space means).
Source Documents Fans will be delighted that they can watch Obama's speech in full:
And read about the strategic plan (presumably since shelved, I haven't looked into it) here:
Comment
Comment