Coronavirus update - NO MORE RESTRICTIONS

[Hilts]

Re: Coronavirus update

Starmer requests Johnson returns to the Commons to correct the record on his Care Home advice.

Watching him v Starmer he really looks totally out of his depth.

[xsnaggle]

Re: Coronavirus update

Drakeford has breached social isolation rules?

When was this. Hes in trouble if so.

He said he had ridden his bike though the park on the way to his allotment. He has been banging on for weeks about the only reason you can go out, to exercise, to go to work if you cannot work from home, etc etc. He didn't say anything about popping along and doing your allotment. Besides how far away from his home is it, and is that in compliance with his definition of 'local'?
I know where he lives and the park her is referring to is probably either Llandaff fields or Pontcanna fields, or maybe both.

But please, whatever you do, don't take this post seriously!

[tell it like it is]

Re: Coronavirus update

Starmer requests Johnson returns to the Commons to correct the record on his Care Home advice.

Watching him v Starmer he really looks totally out of his depth.

Seems Starmer for all his skills needs to learn to read.

The document contains the following caveat...

"This guidance is intended for the current position in the UK where there is currently no transmission of COVID-19 in the community. It is therefore very unlikely that anyone receiving care in a care home or the community will become infected. This is the latest information and will be updated shortly."

So based upon the information given at that point in time, Johnson did not lie..

[tell it like it is]

Re: Coronavirus update

He said he had ridden his bike though the park on the way to his allotment. He has been banging on for weeks about the only reason you can go out, to exercise, to go to work if you cannot work from home, etc etc. He didn't say anything about popping along and doing your allotment. Besides how far away from his home is it, and is that in compliance with his definition of 'local'?
I know where he lives and the park her is referring to is probably either Llandaff fields or Pontcanna fields, or maybe both.

But please, whatever you do, don't take this post seriously!

Sturgeon has her own issues too...

https://www.expressandstar.com/news/uk-news/2020/05/12/sturgeon-denies-coronavirus-cover-up-after-outbreak-linked-to-nike-conference/

[Heisenberg]

Re: Coronavirus update

Naw but I cannot believe that he thought I was actually serious, its just silly.

Maybe your fist reply to me should have been "I wasn't being serious" instead of "there should be no chance" and then it wouldn't look like you're trying to backtrack.

[xsnaggle]

Re: Coronavirus update

Maybe your fist reply to me should have been "I wasn't being serious" instead of "there should be no chance" and then it wouldn't look like you're trying to backtrack.

Not backtracking i promise you. It isn't important enough to even think about it really is it? I'm more concerned about Mr Drakeford's allotment.

[Heisenberg]

Re: Coronavirus update

Not backtracking i promise you. It isn't important enough to even think about it really is it? I'm more concerned about Mr Drakeford's allotment.

Important enough for you to get extremely defensive and accuse me of "having a pop"

[xsnaggle]

Re: Coronavirus update

Important enough for you to get extremely defensive and accuse me of "having a pop"

Not extremely anything. There is nothing extremely important or extremely anything else on this board to get extremely upset about. It's a football message board FFS. If you care to look I think you can interpret many of my posts as tongue-in-cheek. I don't take anything too seriously, the only thing i dislike is people making person insults, there is no need for it.
to me "having a pop" isn't much of a thing. Chill!

[the other bob wilson]

Re: Coronavirus update

Seems Starmer for all his skills needs to learn to read.

The document contains the following caveat...

"This guidance is intended for the current position in the UK where there is currently no transmission of COVID-19 in the community. It is therefore very unlikely that anyone receiving care in a care home or the community will become infected. This is the latest information and will be updated shortly."

So based upon the information given at that point in time, Johnson did not lie..

That was the official advice up to 12 March I understand. I make it that 31 people had died from/with the virus by that date, so the advice was clearly wrong and it goes without saying that it was not "very unlikely that anyone receiving care in a care home or the community will be infected". It's one of those political rows where neither side is completely right or completely wrong.

[xsnaggle]

Re: Coronavirus update

That was the official advice up to 12 March I understand. I make it that 31 people had died from/with the virus by that date, so the advice was clearly wrong and it goes without saying that it was not "very unlikely that anyone receiving care in a care home or the community will be infected". It's one of those political rows where neither side is completely right or completely wrong.

If one or the other side was always right or wrong it would feck politicians up completely. They'd have nothing to argue about. lol Still, it would give them more time to tend their allotments :)

[delmbox]

Re: Coronavirus update

Any truth about this "mass meeting" in Cardiff this weekend or is it a hoax?

https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/w...paign=sharebar

God you can just imagine this, 15 weirdos who need a wash "making a stand" with their badly spelled signs and bits of old food around their mouths

[xsnaggle]

Re: Coronavirus update

God you can just imagine this, 15 weirdos who need a wash "making a stand" with their badly spelled signs and bits of old food around their mouths

....clinging to their out-dated 60's hippy style straggly beards and moustaches.
As long as there are no sandles with socks.

[lardy]

Re: Coronavirus update

Seems Starmer for all his skills needs to learn to read.

The document contains the following caveat...

"This guidance is intended for the current position in the UK where there is currently no transmission of COVID-19 in the community. It is therefore very unlikely that anyone receiving care in a care home or the community will become infected. This is the latest information and will be updated shortly."

So based upon the information given at that point in time, Johnson did not lie..

https://fullfact.org/health/coronavirus-care-homes-guidance/

[Hilts]

Re: Coronavirus update

I dont think Johnson deliberately lied by the way. Hes just looking more and more out of depth and this job is far too big for him. I just think he was waffling without clearly thinking and hoping to blag his way through qusetions.

Hancock looks like hes sh!tting himself about whats going to come out of his mouth next.

He may have got away with his waffling bluster and fist and arm waving with Corbyn but hes going to be picked apart by Starmer.

[xsnaggle]

Re: Coronavirus update

I dont think Johnson deliberately lied by the way. Hes just looking more and more out of depth and this job is far too big for him. I just think he was waffling without clearly thinking and hoping to blag his way through qusetions.

Hancock looks like hes sh!tting himself about whats going to come out of his mouth next.

He may have got away with his waffling bluster and fist and arm waving with Corbyn but hes going to be picked apart by Starmer.

But PMQs is really for the audience. It doesn't resolve anything because generally the Pm never actually answers the question asked, never has. If KS keep insisting on a full and proper ministerial answer he will start to get bland replies like send you question in writing to the relevant department of state or whatever. If he wins the banter then he will start gaining credibility , sounds silly but it seems to be the way it works.