Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Coronavirus update - NO MORE RESTRICTIONS
Collapse
X
-
Re: Coronavirus update
Another "strong man" leader showing he is anything else but that;-
"Here is a further update from Reuters on Brazil, which has removed from public view months of data on its Covid-19 epidemic.
The health ministry in Brazil - which has the world’s second-largest coronavirus outbreak - removed the data from a website that had documented the epidemic over time and by state and municipality.
The ministry also stopped giving a total count of confirmed cases, which have shot past 672,000, more than anywhere outside the United States, or a total death toll, which passed Italy this week, nearing 36,000 by Saturday.
“The cumulative data ... does not reflect the moment the country is in,” Bolsonaro said on Twitter, citing a note from the ministry. “Other actions are underway to improve the reporting of cases and confirmation of diagnoses.”
Bolsonaro has played down the dangers of the pandemic, replaced medical experts in the health ministry with military officials and argued against state lockdowns to fight the virus, hobbling the country’s public health response. Neither Bolsonaro nor the ministry gave a reason for erasing most of the data on the covid.saude.gov.br website, which had been a key public resource for tracking the pandemic."
Comment
-
Re: Coronavirus update
I know it's the weekend and the figures are always lower, but it's good to see no deaths in Scotland and Northern Ireland today and only 77 in the UK. That said, the first time there were 100 or more deaths in a day was on 23 March and if you had told people then that the next time it would drop below 100 in a day would be on June 7, they would have been absolutely horrified.
Comment
-
Re: Coronavirus update
Nowhere have I stated that a random self-appointed subset of the population should be allowed to take it upon themselves to break established social distancing rules in an uncontrolled manner. You're just being a "silly"ass if you think the rule of law can be bypassed on ideological grounds if it suits your own specific agenda. You need to have agreed rules that everybody follows which take into account the situation of every person, and not play Russian roulette with peoples lives in a lawless fashion.Originally posted by the other bob wilson View PostHe said I was "silly" for calling him a hypocrite yesterday - this is exactly the sort of thing I had in my mind when I said it. This time last year, he and others who are always banging on about global, neoliberal conspiracies were lauding those who they saw as freedom fighters taking part in the yellow vest protests, now, because it suits his trumps (pun intended) everything else obsession, he comes at things from a completely different direction - this is not me comparing the merits or otherwise of the different protests, it's me just pointing out Gluey's clear hypocrisy.
Comment
-
Re: Coronavirus update
Why do you think I said I wasn't posting about the rights and wrongs of the protests but about your hypocrisy?Originally posted by Wales-Bales View PostNowhere have I stated that a random self-appointed subset of the population should be allowed to take it upon themselves to break established social distancing rules in an uncontrolled manner. You're just being a "silly"ass if you think the rule of law can be bypassed on ideological grounds if it suits your own specific agenda. You need to have agreed rules that everybody follows which take into account the situation of every person, and not play Russian roulette with peoples lives in a lawless fashion.
Comment
-
Re: Coronavirus update
Why do you consider solutions to problems to be hypocrisy? The economy is in freefall and some corretive action needs to be taken. You sound like a Welsh version of Kim Jong Un.Originally posted by the other bob wilson View PostWhy do you think I said I wasn't posting about the rights and wrongs of the protests but about your hypocrisy?
Comment
-
Re: Coronavirus update
You can find a scientist to to argue the case for pretty much every different aspect of the Coronavirus outbreak. The Guardian has naturally sought out comments to support their views, and the Telegraph, Mail, have also had editorials and articles with many scientists espousing different views - including the so-called 'R' number [which includes care homes and hospitals], and the general efficacy of the whole lockdown process. You pays yer money ...Originally posted by the other bob wilson View PostI watched the interview referred to in this piece earlier and it was good to hear someone speaking in honest, clear, easily understandable, terms on subjects the public want to be told about - I learned a hundred times more from him than I do when having to listen to the vague platitudes trotted out at Government briefings;-
https://www.theguardian.com/world/20...scientist-says
Comment
-
Re: Coronavirus update
Coronavirus: US-China virus row flares with senator's comments https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-52954697
Comment
-
Re: Coronavirus update
How on earth could one country possibly block another from producing a vaccine? How would that be possible?Originally posted by goats View PostCoronavirus: US-China virus row flares with senator's comments https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/health-52954697
Comment
-
Re: Coronavirus update
By holding back information about specifics of the virus and its originsOriginally posted by The Lone Gunman View PostHow on earth could one country possibly block another from producing a vaccine? How would that be possible?
There has been an increasing amount of press suggesting that the virus was manipulated in the biological laboratory in Wuhan, to make it easier to to replicate in a host..ie a chimena. Whether that's true and whether it was released intentionally or by accident who knows. Lets for the moment assume it came from the lab and not a wet market.
One thing that is increasingly evident is that two countries in particular, USA & UK, both with very advanced healthcare technology and with very similar lifestyles and diet, have suffered the worst death rates in the world. Generally, the further east you go the better the outcomes, through countries with a Mediterranean lifestyle, and lowest death rates in those with an Asian lifestyle.
If the virus was manipulated intracellularly there must have been an objective, and maybe that objective was to make it particularly virulent to those with a Western lifestyle and diet, particularly USA citizens for political reasons.
Im not sure whether such specific targeting is scientifically possible but it makes for an interesting hypothesis.
Comment
-
Re: Coronavirus update
Originally posted by lisvaneblue View PostBy holding back information about specifics of the virus and its origins
There has been an increasing amount of press suggesting that the virus was manipulated in the biological laboratory in Wuhan, to make it easier to to replicate in a host..ie a chimena. Whether that's true and whether it was released intentionally or by accident who knows. Lets for the moment assume it came from the lab and not a wet market.
One thing that is increasingly evident is that two countries in particular, USA & UK, both with very advanced healthcare technology and with very similar lifestyles and diet, have suffered the worst death rates in the world. Generally, the further east you go the better the outcomes, through countries with a Mediterranean lifestyle, and lowest death rates in those with an Asian lifestyle.
If the virus was manipulated intracellularly there must have been an objective, and maybe that objective was to make it particularly virulent to those with a Western lifestyle and diet, particularly USA citizens for political reasons.
Im not sure whether such specific targeting is scientifically possible but it makes for an interesting hypothesis.
There are studies (not Chinese ones before you ask) where analysis shows it is natural and not manmade.
There are two things needed for a country to be at the top of the death league, and that's 1) lots of deaths and 2) accurate recording of death. The US and the UK are at the top because they are the countries with both. I'd be certain that China, Brazil, Russia, India etc (not western countries with western lifestyles) have actually had more deaths than the UK.
I'd also say that generally the further east you go, the better the governments reacted, rather than due to the lifestyle.
Did you mean chimera?
Comment


Comment