Announcement
Oxford Vaccine
-
Re: Oxford Vaccine
RED OCTOBER
The dripping isn't going to stop
CDC finally caves and hands over their V-Safe data.
— Hungry for Truth with Drea Humphrey (@DreaHumphrey) October 6, 2022
7.7% ( 782,900 people) out of the 10 million included in the data, required medical care after taking the "safe and effective" COVID jabs that so many have been coerced into taking. pic.twitter.com/zTX6pzlhcN
GOD WINS
Clandestine
Comment
-
Re: Oxford Vaccine
Originally posted by Hilts View PostAs well as the alternative forum can we have a matt le tiss loony dump forum.
Those you mock today may one day be those your grandchildren thank and ask their grandparents why didn't you do anything? and why did you mock those that did? "
The Blood of the Jabbed.
— Chris (@chrislittlewoo8) October 6, 2022
This is a peer reviewed study of 1006 people who took the jab & what happened with their blood.
94% of the people showed abnormalities in their blood after the jab. 100% of these showed alterations to their blood post injection.
This is not normal. pic.twitter.com/zqaOtK9hnH
Sincerely
Clandestine
Comment
-
Re: Oxford Vaccine
Originally posted by Clandestine View PostThose you mock today may one day be those your grandchildren thank and ask their grandparents why didn't you do anything? and why did you mock those that did? "
The Blood of the Jabbed.
— Chris (@chrislittlewoo8) October 6, 2022
This is a peer reviewed study of 1006 people who took the jab & what happened with their blood.
94% of the people showed abnormalities in their blood after the jab. 100% of these showed alterations to their blood post injection.
This is not normal. pic.twitter.com/zqaOtK9hnH
Sincerely
Clandestine
To quote just one comment from that 'conversation' on Twitter:
'The article was written by a Periodontist, Acupuncturist, and an Otolaryngologist. Let me know when you have an article, that is actually peer reviewed, written by people who are actual experts in the field they are writing about.'
DOG wins
jon1959
Comment
-
Re: Oxford Vaccine
SATAN doesn't win JonOriginally posted by jon1959 View PostTo quote just one comment from that 'conversation' on Twitter:
'The article was written by a Periodontist, Acupuncturist, and an Otolaryngologist. Let me know when you have an article, that is actually peer reviewed, written by people who are actual experts in the field they are writing about.'
DOG wins
jon1959
One comment on twitter!!! ?
Have you jumped the shark?
vaccines, vaccine theory, vaccine research, vaccine practice, medical toxicants, medical toxins, vaccine contaminants, vaccine excipients, vaccine adjuvants, vaccine pathogens, vaccine toxoids, targeted pathogens, vaccine policy, vaccine policies, vaccine trials, vaccination, lateral transmission of targeted pathogens, disease prevention, vaccine enhancements, herd immunity doctrine, vaccine distribution, vaccine uptake, vaccine licensing, vaccinated versus unvaccinated populations, vaccine adverse events, vaccine trajectories, vaccine manufacture, vaccine quality control
Get the latest breaking news, in-depth reporting, and insightful analysis on a wide range of topics, including politics, culture, and world events | The Epoch Times is a trusted source for real news and information that is free from influence and bias.
Do you want to have another think about it ?
I have a few other things to do but will have a look later this evening when it's quieter
if my due dilligence hasn't been what it should i'll offer an apology.
Humble (maybe)
Clandestine
Comment
-
Re: Oxford Vaccine
Do you know what blood is supposed to look like after a vaccination? I don’t.Originally posted by Clandestine View PostThose you mock today may one day be those your grandchildren thank and ask their grandparents why didn't you do anything? and why did you mock those that did? "
The Blood of the Jabbed.
— Chris (@chrislittlewoo8) October 6, 2022
This is a peer reviewed study of 1006 people who took the jab & what happened with their blood.
94% of the people showed abnormalities in their blood after the jab. 100% of these showed alterations to their blood post injection.
This is not normal. pic.twitter.com/zqaOtK9hnH
Sincerely
Clandestine
Does it do this for all vaccines?
How has the blood been altered?
There’s plenty of medications that “alter” blood. Does this fall inline with the safe parameters those drugs create or is it a concerning alteration?
Who has peer reviewed this study? Are they unbiased?
Etc, etc. I don’t expect you to actually answer, you seem content to take a tweet at face value. But it’s food for thought isn’t it?
Comment
-
Re: Oxford Vaccine
I have had one account here, you can see my join date.Originally posted by TWGL1 View PostWhy are you singling me out I’m really interested to know it was years ago, what was yours as I don’t remember you all those years ago ? You have a personal issue with me Lardy ?
Did you stop posting before 2009? Others here will remember you I'm sure, particularly as you say
"For reference when I used this board years ago, ( when Posters like QPR London and Victor !) lwere regular posters and most people knew each-other and they certainly knew me"
So strange that you don't want to say your old username.
Comment
-
Re: Oxford Vaccine
I posted a link to the Pfizer Covid vaccine trial data in another thread.Originally posted by Citizen's Nephew View PostI mentioned today that I think the Alt forum really stands for Alternative Universe.
Should you have missed it, here it is: https://granitegrok.com/wp-content/u...Experience.pdf
Beginning on page 30 is listed the 1,294 different adverse reactions Pfizer observed among their trial participants. The FDA, a US health authority, wanted to conceal that data for up to 76 years, but were finally forced to by order of a judge. About 7 months after the above document was published the BBC et al have kept mum about those adverse reactions presumably because they indicate it isn't and never was safe.
Experts the like of Professor Dolores Cahill make no bones about it, she says it's a bioweapon designed to kill and maim over time with the majority of volunteers dying between 3 and 5 years after their initial Pfizer shot.
Comment
-
Re: Oxford Vaccine
I posted that twitter in the Ballon conspiracy thread a few days ago. The FDA and now the CDC tried their best to cover-up critical and extremely damaging info about the BS prevailing narrative they pushed.Originally posted by Clandestine View PostRED OCTOBER
The dripping isn't going to stop
CDC finally caves and hands over their V-Safe data.
— Hungry for Truth with Drea Humphrey (@DreaHumphrey) October 6, 2022
7.7% ( 782,900 people) out of the 10 million included in the data, required medical care after taking the "safe and effective" COVID jabs that so many have been coerced into taking. pic.twitter.com/zTX6pzlhcN
GOD WINS
Clandestine
Most of the victims remain unaware they're fecked because Tucker Carlson's show in the US aside and perhaps GB News here, corporate media remain quiet.
Comment
-
Re: Oxford Vaccine
watched this video earlier regarding the vaccine injured
harrowing stuff
Comment

Comment