Oxford Vaccine

[TWGL1]

Re: Oxford Vaccine

Florida withdraw Covid vaccine recommendation for males aged 18-39 due to an increased risk of cardiac-related death.

https://www.floridahealth.gov/newsro...accine.pr.html

[Organ Morgan.]

Re: Oxford Vaccine

Help me a little with the maths. Is 94% of 5 billion people a lot or not?

Because if it's a lot of people affected, then I would expect to have heard a bit more about it than from you and nowhere else at all.

The host of that news report said it. Put your specs on.

You will be able to hear him say it should you watch it.

I post links to lots of stuff you won't see on your precious goggle box. One I've included several times of late is to Pfizer's Covid trial side effects where they noted 1,294 different ones. You haven't heard that from the Beeb or the NHS or any politician even though it is demonstrably true, and yet it's still being pushed the way of British parents and guardians of those with children as young as five years.

No doubt that censorship is something you heartily agree with despite being unable to claim you're unaware of the staggering number of side-effects Pfizer and the FDA wanted to conceal for the next 76 years. You and the other Teletubbies ought to give your head a shake instead of tacitly supporting this protocol. Shame on all of you for your complicity.

[Mrs Steve R]

Re: Oxford Vaccine

watched this video earlier regarding the vaccine injured

harrowing stuff

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dIVZ5ssWB-o

Interesting that. I decided before the jabs were even out that I was not having any and I'm happy with my decision.

[Wales-Bales]

Re: Oxford Vaccine

Interesting that. I decided before the jabs were even out that I was not having any and I'm happy with my decision.

Viruses with genetically engineered spike proteins being developed in a Wuhan biolab, followed by Event 201 and a real live pandemic a few months later, and then a "safe & effective" cure without any long-term safety data, which utilised a new untried mRNA technology that targeted the genetically modified spike. What could possibly go wrong?

[Organ Morgan.]

Re: Oxford Vaccine

Interesting that. I decided before the jabs were even out that I was not having any and I'm happy with my decision.

I'd like to respectfully offer a reason for why you may wish to reconsider your decision not to have some lovely mRNA with its groovy spike proteins and cute lipid nanoparticles flowing through your body.

Developing blood clots the size of a billiard ball, or having an enlarged heart due to myocarditis, or suddenly developing stage 4 cancer, or acquiring any number of neurological disorders such as the human equivalent of Mad Cow Disease, or having HIV as your natural immune system slowly disintegrates may appear risky to help counter something 99.9% of humanity survived during the past nearly three years.

But I ask you to imagine how pleased that awfully nice Bill 'if we do a good job with vaccines we could reduce the world's population by 10%-15%' Gates will be should you decide to kneel for a Covid syringe.

[Wales-Bales]

Re: Oxford Vaccine

watched this video earlier regarding the vaccine injured

harrowing stuff

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dIVZ5ssWB-o

Who was funding the Wuhan biolab, and who sponsored Event 201?

[Canton Kev]

Re: Oxford Vaccine

But I ask you to imagine how pleased that awfully nice Bill 'if we do a good job with vaccines we could reduce the world's population by 10%-15%' Gates will be should you decide to kneel for a Covid syringe.

What do you think he was implying with that quote?

[Mrs Steve R]

Re: Oxford Vaccine

Viruses with genetically engineered spike proteins being developed in a Wuhan biolab, followed by Event 201 and a real live pandemic a few months later, and then a "safe & effective" cure without any long-term safety data, which utilised a new untried mRNA technology that targeted the genetically modified spike. What could possibly go wrong?

Sounds like a plot for a film.

I'd like to respectfully offer a reason for why you may wish to reconsider your decision not to have some lovely mRNA with its groovy spike proteins and cute lipid nanoparticles flowing through your body.

Developing blood clots the size of a billiard ball, or having an enlarged heart due to myocarditis, or suddenly developing stage 4 cancer, or acquiring any number of neurological disorders such as the human equivalent of Mad Cow Disease, or having HIV as your natural immune system slowly disintegrates may appear risky to help counter something 99.9% of humanity survived during the past nearly three years.

But I ask you to imagine how pleased that awfully nice Bill 'if we do a good job with vaccines we could reduce the world's population by 10%-15%' Gates will be should you decide to kneel for a Covid syringe.

Some already say I'm a mad cow so no thanks

[Organ Morgan.]

Re: Oxford Vaccine

Rearrange these three words. Slip a Freudian.

[lardy]

Re: Oxford Vaccine

The host of that news report said it. Put your specs on.

You will be able to hear him say it should you watch it.

I post links to lots of stuff you won't see on your precious goggle box. One I've included several times of late is to Pfizer's Covid trial side effects where they noted 1,294 different ones. You haven't heard that from the Beeb or the NHS or any politician even though it is demonstrably true, and yet it's still being pushed the way of British parents and guardians of those with children as young as five years.

No doubt that censorship is something you heartily agree with despite being unable to claim you're unaware of the staggering number of side-effects Pfizer and the FDA wanted to conceal for the next 76 years. You and the other Teletubbies ought to give your head a shake instead of tacitly supporting this protocol. Shame on all of you for your complicity.

I think you might be missing the point. If 4.5 billion people now have abnormal blood which causes sudden collapsing then we wouldn't be learning about it on the gogglebox, it would be a very obvious part of our reality already.

It is very quaint btw, and quite telling about your advanced age, that you think we all spend our time watching BBC and ITV.

[lardy]

Re: Oxford Vaccine

What do you think he was implying with that quote?

I'm sure you know this, but for the benefit of everyone else, he was talking about reducing population growth, not population. Organ misquoted him, either deliberately or accidentally.

[Organ Morgan.]

Re: Oxford Vaccine

I think you might be missing the point. If 4.5 billion people now have abnormal blood which causes sudden collapsing then we wouldn't be learning about it on the gogglebox, it would be a very obvious part of our reality already.

It is very quaint btw, and quite telling about your advanced age, that you think we all spend our time watching BBC and ITV.

I note you, along with your TV-loving brethren always have precisely nowt to say about those Pfizer-admitted 1,294 different adverse reactions. It's always divert and deflect, never discourse.

"Curiouser and curiouser," said Alice.

[Organ Morgan.]

Re: Oxford Vaccine

I'm sure you know this, but for the benefit of everyone else, he was talking about reducing population growth, not population. Organ misquoted him, either deliberately or accidentally.

I didn't misquote him. It's easy to find at youtube or elsewhere.

You could argue I took his words in the wrong context, as the poster Cyril 'I love vaccines' Evans, would claim.

[lardy]

Re: Oxford Vaccine

I didn't misquote him. It's easy to find at youtube or elsewhere.

You could argue I took his words in the wrong context, as the poster Cyril 'I love vaccines' Evans, would claim.

He doesn't say "we could reduce the world's population by 10%-15%'", he says "lower that " referring to population growth.

[lardy]

Re: Oxford Vaccine

I note you, along with your TV-loving brethren always have precisely nowt to say about those Pfizer-admitted 1,294 different adverse reactions. It's always divert and deflect, never discourse.

"Curiouser and curiouser," said Alice.

Just about all medications have adverse effects, more commonly called side effects. Your doctor is supposed to tell you when he prescribes it.

Most side effects are not serious, and in your pdf (which I have looked at) this is also true of their results.

Of the serious side effects, they are fractions of a percent of the total number of doses. In other words, very rare - on the scale of a few in a million.

Now I've responded to that, perhaps you can respond to my query about why, if 4.5 billion people have blood which causes them to spontaneously collapse, nobody knows anybody who knows anybody who has experienced it? Could it be because it's just not true?