Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Oxford Vaccine

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: Oxford Vaccine

    Same horse. I paraphrased what he said.

    Returning once more to what you're extremely reticent to comment on. I can't think why.

    Below I've pasted a tiny fraction of Pfizer's listed adverse reactions. Have you any remarks to make pertaining to them?

    Still's disease;Stoma site thrombosis;Stoma site
    vasculitis;Stress cardiomyopathy;Stridor;Subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus;Subacute
    endocarditis;Subacute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy;Subclavian artery
    embolism;Subclavian artery thrombosis;Subclavian vein thrombosis;Sudden unexplained
    death in epilepsy;Superior sagittal sinus thrombosis;Susac's syndrome;Suspected COVID19;Swelling;Swelling face;Swelling of eyelid;Swollen tongue;Sympathetic
    ophthalmia;Systemic lupus erythematosus;Systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity
    index abnormal;Systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index decreased;Systemic
    lupus erythematosus disease activity index increased;Systemic lupus erythematosus
    rash

    Comment


    • Re: Oxford Vaccine

      Originally posted by Organ Morgan. View Post
      Same horse. I paraphrased what he said.
      It's not the same, though is it? Reducing population and reducing population growth are different.

      In the first, the population decreases. In the second, it increases less quickly.

      Comment


      • Re: Oxford Vaccine

        Originally posted by Organ Morgan. View Post
        Same horse. I paraphrased what he said.

        Returning once more to what you're extremely reticent to comment on. I can't think why.

        Below I've pasted a tiny fraction of Pfizer's listed adverse reactions. Have you any remarks to make pertaining to them?

        Still's disease;Stoma site thrombosis;Stoma site
        vasculitis;Stress cardiomyopathy;Stridor;Subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus;Subacute
        endocarditis;Subacute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy;Subclavian artery
        embolism;Subclavian artery thrombosis;Subclavian vein thrombosis;Sudden unexplained
        death in epilepsy;Superior sagittal sinus thrombosis;Susac's syndrome;Suspected COVID19;Swelling;Swelling face;Swelling of eyelid;Swollen tongue;Sympathetic
        ophthalmia;Systemic lupus erythematosus;Systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity
        index abnormal;Systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index decreased;Systemic
        lupus erythematosus disease activity index increased;Systemic lupus erythematosus
        rash
        Originally posted by lardy View Post
        Just about all medications have adverse effects, more commonly called side effects. Your doctor is supposed to tell you when he prescribes it.

        Most side effects are not serious, and in your pdf (which I have looked at) this is also true of their results.

        Of the serious side effects, they are fractions of a percent of the total number of doses. In other words, very rare - on the scale of a few in a million.

        Now I've responded to that, perhaps you can respond to my query about why, if 4.5 billion people have blood which causes them to spontaneously collapse, nobody knows anybody who knows anybody who has experienced it? Could it be because it's just not true?
        I hadn't heard anyone claim 94% of the blood of the clot shotted was abnormal before hearing that host say it.

        As Montagnier, Cahill and some others have hypothesised though, it's a soft kill/slow kill aka delayed kill bioweapon.

        Comment


        • Re: Oxford Vaccine

          Originally posted by Organ Morgan. View Post
          I hadn't heard anyone claim 94% of the blood of the clot shotted was abnormal before hearing that host say it.

          As Montagnier, Cahill and some others have hypothesised though, it's a soft kill/slow kill aka delayed kill bioweapon.
          And the advantages of killing ~5 billion people is…..

          Comment


          • Re: Oxford Vaccine

            Originally posted by lardy View Post
            It's not the same, though is it? Reducing population and reducing population growth are different.

            In the first, the population decreases. In the second, it increases less quickly.
            With all due respect, that's your spin on his words.

            That fella's name, should you be unaware, appeared on 28 separate occasions on Epstein's private jet flight logs to his island, the vast majority of his visits was post Epstein getting convicted for noncing.

            He no shining knight.

            Comment


            • Re: Oxford Vaccine

              Originally posted by Organ Morgan. View Post
              I hadn't heard anyone claim 94% of the blood of the clot shotted was abnormal before hearing that host say it.

              As Montagnier, Cahill and some others have hypothesised though, it's a soft kill/slow kill aka delayed kill bioweapon.
              So shall we assume that the claim is bollocks?

              Or shall we gormlessly nod along with our mouth slightly open at everything we see on the internet, no matter how clearly implausible it is?

              Montagnier died months ago at the ripe old age of 89 by the way, and was heavily criticised by other academics for his nutty COVID-19 views.

              Comment


              • Re: Oxford Vaccine

                Originally posted by Canton Kev View Post
                And the advantages of killing ~5 billion people is…..
                More food for me

                Comment


                • Re: Oxford Vaccine

                  Originally posted by Canton Kev View Post
                  And the advantages of killing ~5 billion people is…..
                  Ask Klaus Schwab, or visit the WEF site to read all about the Great Reset.

                  Comment


                  • Re: Oxford Vaccine

                    Originally posted by Organ Morgan. View Post
                    Same horse. I paraphrased what he said.

                    Returning once more to what you're extremely reticent to comment on. I can't think why.

                    Below I've pasted a tiny fraction of Pfizer's listed adverse reactions. Have you any remarks to make pertaining to them?

                    Still's disease;Stoma site thrombosis;Stoma site
                    vasculitis;Stress cardiomyopathy;Stridor;Subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus;Subacute
                    endocarditis;Subacute inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy;Subclavian artery
                    embolism;Subclavian artery thrombosis;Subclavian vein thrombosis;Sudden unexplained
                    death in epilepsy;Superior sagittal sinus thrombosis;Susac's syndrome;Suspected COVID19;Swelling;Swelling face;Swelling of eyelid;Swollen tongue;Sympathetic
                    ophthalmia;Systemic lupus erythematosus;Systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity
                    index abnormal;Systemic lupus erythematosus disease activity index decreased;Systemic
                    lupus erythematosus disease activity index increased;Systemic lupus erythematosus
                    rash
                    Small sample here of the listed side effects for the measles vaccine:

                    Panniculitis; atypical measles; fever; syncope; headache; dizziness; malaise; irritability, Vasculitis, Pancreatitis; diarrhea; vomiting; parotitis; nausea, Diabetes mellitus,Thrombocytopenia, purpura; regional lymphadenopathy; leukocytosis, Anaphylaxis and anaphylactoid reactions, Arthritis; arthralgia; myalgia, Encephalitis; encephalopathy; measles inclusion body encephalitis (MIBE) ; subacute sclerosing panencephalitis (SSPE); Guillain-Barré Syndrome (GBS); acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM); transverse myelitis; febrie convulsions; afebrile convulsions or seizures; ataxia; polyneuritis; polyneuropathy; ocular palsies; paresthesia, Pneumonia; pneumonitis, sore throat; cough; rhinitis.

                    See, we can all copy and paste scary looking words

                    Comment


                    • Re: Oxford Vaccine

                      Originally posted by lardy View Post
                      So shall we assume that the claim is bollocks?

                      Or shall we gormlessly nod along with our mouth slightly open at everything we see on the internet, no matter how clearly implausible it is?

                      Montagnier died months ago at the ripe old age of 89 by the way, and was heavily criticised by other academics for his nutty COVID-19 views.
                      You should know all about gormlessly nodding along because I'd have no problem wagering my best harmonica against a single peanut of yours that that's exactly what you did when the telly instructed you to roll a sleeve up on three occasions.

                      You must have had your tongue firmly in cheek when claiming it's not unusual to have 1,294 different adverse reactions for a trial vaccine. There were several different kinds of thrombosis and diseases among the small fraction I pasted earlier.

                      Next up you'll state there was nothing suspicious about trying to hide that info for 76 years!

                      In 1976 the Yank health authorities pulled the Swine Flu vaccine after 50 deaths as they felt it was too dangerous.

                      Today their VAERS reporting has the number of US Covid vaccine deaths at 30 thousand, that's 600 times greater than in 1976.

                      And they're sticking it into the arms of babies at six months!

                      I was correct earlier, you and your cohort are shameless.

                      Comment


                      • Re: Oxford Vaccine

                        Caveat on the VAERS website, strangely overlooked by Organ.

                        “While very important in monitoring vaccine safety, VAERS reports alone cannot be used to determine if a vaccine caused or contributed to an adverse event or illness.

                        “The reports may contain information that is incomplete, inaccurate, coincidental, or unverifiable. Most reports to VAERS are voluntary, which means they are subject to biases.”

                        Comment


                        • Re: Oxford Vaccine

                          Originally posted by lardy View Post
                          Caveat on the VAERS website, strangely overlooked by Organ.

                          “While very important in monitoring vaccine safety, VAERS reports alone cannot be used to determine if a vaccine caused or contributed to an adverse event or illness.

                          “The reports may contain information that is incomplete, inaccurate, coincidental, or unverifiable. Most reports to VAERS are voluntary, which means they are subject to biases.”
                          Ok, we get it that you are all in with the program

                          Comment


                          • Re: Oxford Vaccine

                            Originally posted by Wales-Bales View Post
                            Ok, we get it that you are all in with the program
                            You do amuse me. You pretend to be “in the know” about the big bads of the world yet 99% of your contributions to this board are waiting for Organ Morgan to post some random link that he’s found, then you jump in with a quip or one liner about how you totally knew that was the case or how it’s all part of the Great Reset. You remind me of a little puppy trying to join in with the big dogs.

                            One day you’ll share your super accurate “Great Reset” timeline you’ve proudly boasted about

                            Comment


                            • Re: Oxford Vaccine

                              Originally posted by Canton Kev View Post
                              You do amuse me. You pretend to be “in the know” about the big bads of the world yet 99% of your contributions to this board are waiting for Organ Morgan to post some random link that he’s found, then you jump in with a quip or one liner about how you totally knew that was the case or how it’s all part of the Great Reset. You remind me of a little puppy trying to join in with the big dogs.

                              One day you’ll share your super accurate “Great Reset” timeline you’ve proudly boasted about
                              Painfully true

                              Comment


                              • Re: Oxford Vaccine

                                Astonishing levels of wilful denial in this thread.

                                An unsolicited stranger knock's at one's front door after alighting his rickety caravan. "Top o' the morning," he says in a pronounced Irish accent before asking whether you might be interested in a wonderful timeshare property he knows of in Swansea's Town Hill Housing Estate that's available for a bargain price.

                                For anyone who's sincerely unconcerned that the US FDA bent over backwards to secrete that shocking number of adverse reactions among Pfizer's trial participants until the year 2097 then they would also be gullible enough to invite Patrick the pikey into their front room to stretch out on the settee.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X