Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Oxford Vaccine

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: Oxford Vaccine

    Originally posted by Canton Kev View Post
    You do amuse me. You pretend to be “in the know” about the big bads of the world yet 99% of your contributions to this board are waiting for Organ Morgan to post some random link that he’s found, then you jump in with a quip or one liner about how you totally knew that was the case or how it’s all part of the Great Reset. You remind me of a little puppy trying to join in with the big dogs.

    One day you’ll share your super accurate “Great Reset” timeline you’ve proudly boasted about
    I don't want to spoil the ending for you, and besides that, it's fun watching you lot stumble around in the dark

    Comment


    • Re: Oxford Vaccine

      What was the actual point of vaccine passports , following the recent findings from Pfizer ?

      Dutch MEP Twitter feed

      BREAKING: In COVID hearing, #Pfizer director admits: #vaccine was never tested on preventing transmission. "Get vaccinated for others" was always a lie. The only purpose of the #COVID passport: forcing people to get vaccinated. The world needs to know. Share this video! ⤵️ https://t.co/su1WqgB4dO

      Comment


      • Re: Oxford Vaccine

        Originally posted by TWGL1 View Post
        What was the actual point of vaccine passports , following the recent findings from Pfizer ?

        Dutch MEP Twitter feed

        https://twitter.com/rob_roos/status/...iMJGQ0dfq78pDA
        These comments from Pfizer aren't findings, they're just a statement of fact...the vaccine wasn't tested on reducing transmission..end of.

        It does not say that it doesn't reduce transmissions, just that it wasn't tested for it.

        Comment


        • Re: Oxford Vaccine

          Originally posted by lisvaneblue View Post
          These comments from Pfizer aren't findings, they're just a statement of fact...the vaccine wasn't tested on reducing transmission..end of.

          It does not say that it doesn't reduce transmissions, just that it wasn't tested for it.
          Their spokespersons/representatives in government certainly said they reduced transmission!

          Comment


          • Re: Oxford Vaccine

            Originally posted by Wales-Bales View Post
            I don't want to spoil the ending for you, and besides that, it's fun watching you lot stumble around in the dark
            Hmm how convenient for you and totally unexpected. Who saw that one coming?

            You don't know, you don't have any idea let alone an accurate timeline of events predicting a sinister global plan to end our way of life.
            You'll continue to wait for someone else to post something before jumping in to say "ha I knew that, told you so" and say very little else of relevance.

            You contribute as much to the conversation as Sludge whenever the Tories get discussed. At least Organ Morgan posts links and videos to his continuously failing predictions. The few I've bothered to check out seem dubious and fall apart with some reasoning applied, or if they have elements of truth they are (probably intentionally) misleading. But at least he has some sort of platform to hold his views upon. You piggyback his posts and disappear when questioned.

            If there does turn out to be some secret cabal ran by the world's elite, you know the same as anyone else on this board. You're not in the loop no matter what you try to convince people. You know it's true, as does anyone else that looks at your posts.

            There is one very easy way to show you are "in the know" but I'm sure you'll have some convenient excuse why you won't opt to take that route

            Comment


            • Re: Oxford Vaccine

              Originally posted by Canton Kev View Post
              Hmm how convenient for you and totally unexpected. Who saw that one coming?

              You don't know, you don't have any idea let alone an accurate timeline of events predicting a sinister global plan to end our way of life.
              You'll continue to wait for someone else to post something before jumping in to say "ha I knew that, told you so" and say very little else of relevance.

              You contribute as much to the conversation as Sludge whenever the Tories get discussed. At least Organ Morgan posts links and videos to his continuously failing predictions. The few I've bothered to check out seem dubious and fall apart with some reasoning applied, or if they have elements of truth they are (probably intentionally) misleading. But at least he has some sort of platform to hold his views upon. You piggyback his posts and disappear when questioned.

              If there does turn out to be some secret cabal ran by the world's elite, you know the same as anyone else on this board. You're not in the loop no matter what you try to convince people. You know it's true, as does anyone else that looks at your posts.

              There is one very easy way to show you are "in the know" but I'm sure you'll have some convenient excuse why you won't opt to take that route
              The very fact that certain high profile people in media who advocated removing non vaccinated from society have now changed their tune speaks volumes.

              So what was the point of vaccine passports ….. anyone ?



              Comment


              • Re: Oxford Vaccine

                Originally posted by Canton Kev View Post
                Hmm how convenient for you and totally unexpected. Who saw that one coming?

                You don't know, you don't have any idea let alone an accurate timeline of events predicting a sinister global plan to end our way of life.
                You'll continue to wait for someone else to post something before jumping in to say "ha I knew that, told you so" and say very little else of relevance.

                You contribute as much to the conversation as Sludge whenever the Tories get discussed. At least Organ Morgan posts links and videos to his continuously failing predictions. The few I've bothered to check out seem dubious and fall apart with some reasoning applied, or if they have elements of truth they are (probably intentionally) misleading. But at least he has some sort of platform to hold his views upon. You piggyback his posts and disappear when questioned.

                If there does turn out to be some secret cabal ran by the world's elite, you know the same as anyone else on this board. You're not in the loop no matter what you try to convince people. You know it's true, as does anyone else that looks at your posts.

                There is one very easy way to show you are "in the know" but I'm sure you'll have some convenient excuse why you won't opt to take that route
                I solved the puzzle ages ago

                Comment


                • Re: Oxford Vaccine

                  Originally posted by TWGL1 View Post
                  The very fact that certain high profile people in media who advocated removing non vaccinated from society have now changed their tune speaks volumes.

                  So what was the point of vaccine passports ….. anyone ?



                  Lot's of plausible deniability followed by resignations and retirements to avoid accountability.

                  Comment


                  • Re: Oxford Vaccine

                    Originally posted by Wales-Bales View Post
                    Their spokespersons/representatives in government certainly said they reduced transmission!
                    Maybe the vaccine did reduce transmissions....Pfizer simply said that their vaccine wean't tested for it.
                    Maybe others were?

                    Comment


                    • Re: Oxford Vaccine

                      Originally posted by lisvaneblue View Post
                      Maybe the vaccine did reduce transmissions....Pfizer simply said that their vaccine wean't tested for it.
                      Maybe others were?
                      It might have reduced transmission, but so would natural immunity.

                      Comment


                      • Re: Oxford Vaccine

                        Originally posted by lisvaneblue View Post
                        Maybe the vaccine did reduce transmissions....Pfizer simply said that their vaccine wean't tested for it.
                        Maybe others were?
                        Pfizer didn't say much about anything, and they actually wanted to hide all of their development and test data for 75years.

                        Comment


                        • Re: Oxford Vaccine

                          Originally posted by Wales-Bales View Post
                          Pfizer didn't say much about anything, and they actually wanted to hide all of their development and test data for 75years.
                          I don't think the Covid vaccine data has been around for 75 years....and by the way in the reference you mention the FDA was accused, not Pfizer, of hiding data

                          Comment


                          • Re: Oxford Vaccine

                            Originally posted by lisvaneblue View Post
                            I don't think the Covid vaccine data has been around for 75 years....and by the way in the reference you mention the FDA was accused, not Pfizer, of hiding data
                            More plausible deniability, just get somebody else to hide the data and avoid all accountability.

                            Comment


                            • Re: Oxford Vaccine

                              Originally posted by Wales-Bales View Post
                              I solved the puzzle ages ago
                              Nah you haven’t. You’d be shouting it from the proverbial rooftops.
                              You’re on the outside of the secret meetings but don’t worry I’m sure OM will give you the minutes

                              Comment


                              • Re: Oxford Vaccine

                                Originally posted by Wales-Bales View Post
                                More plausible deniability, just get somebody else to hide the data and avoid all accountability.



                                It's simple to spot who the clot shot-ees are. They cannot accept they were well and truly suckered.

                                Not once, not twice, but three times, and the stupidest of all want yet more mRNA with shot number four!

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X