I’ve not been a fan of his but since McCarthy has come, I was very impressed with his performances. Ralls seems to have displaced him and we appear disjointed as a result. Didn’t think I’d say it but based on what I’ve seen I’d now be starting him every week alongside Vaulks
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Marlon Pack
Collapse
X
-
Re: Marlon Pack
Me too.Originally posted by StraightOuttaCanton View PostI’ve not been a fan of his but since McCarthy has come, I was very impressed with his performances. Ralls seems to have displaced him and we appear disjointed as a result. Didn’t think I’d say it but based on what I’ve seen I’d now be starting him every week alongside Vaulks
This especially after Ralls's lackluster performance last week, I was surprised at his inclusion this.
Perhaps Pack is carrying a knock.
There are times when we as fans are not party to all that really goes on at the club and particularly on the training ground.
Vaulks has proved his worth creatively and also chipped in with some excellent goals.
They would be my pairing in the middle but it is good that we do have options.
Comment
-
Re: Marlon Pack
I think we miss his composure.Originally posted by StraightOuttaCanton View PostI’ve not been a fan of his but since McCarthy has come, I was very impressed with his performances. Ralls seems to have displaced him and we appear disjointed as a result. Didn’t think I’d say it but based on what I’ve seen I’d now be starting him every week alongside Vaulks
Comment
-
Re: Marlon Pack
Playing with only two in central midfield and three at the back was always a bit of a calculated risk, but it worked well for a while even when we were up against a central midfield three. However, City have a high intensity way of playing under Mick McCarthy which puts all of the outfield players bar the back three under a lot of physical pressure. Marlon Packs absence for all but ten minutes of our last two games is a mystery, especially as he had been playing well, but maybe the analysis tools they have these days identified that he was in need of a rest - I’d expect there to be at least one change in central mififor the Stoke match.
Comment
-
Re: Marlon Pack
Let’s hope there is a good reason as we appear to have slipped away since pack hasn’t started and Ralls has.....Originally posted by the other bob wilson View PostPlaying with only two in central midfield and three at the back was always a bit of a calculated risk, but it worked well for a while even when we were up against a central midfield three. However, City have a high intensity way of playing under Mick McCarthy which puts all of the outfield players bar the back three under a lot of physical pressure. Marlon Packs absence for all but ten minutes of our last two games is a mystery, especially as he had been playing well, but maybe the analysis tools they have these days identified that he was in need of a rest - I’d expect there to be at least one change in central mififor the Stoke match.
Comment
-
Re: Marlon Pack
And neither of them could pass water.Originally posted by J R Hartley View PostVaulks and Ralls doesn’t work, they are too similar. Needs to be one or the other alongside Pack.
Vaulks is a dreadful footballer, no vision, no passing ability, no composure. The only thing masking his awful performances as a midfield player is his dubious ability to clatter into people and hit a sweet shot once every 12 games. The pair of them should be moved on in the summer and the midfield completely rebuilt.
Comment
Quick Navigation
Collapse

Comment