Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Marlon Pack

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Marlon Pack

    I’ve not been a fan of his but since McCarthy has come, I was very impressed with his performances. Ralls seems to have displaced him and we appear disjointed as a result. Didn’t think I’d say it but based on what I’ve seen I’d now be starting him every week alongside Vaulks

  • #2
    Re: Marlon Pack

    I’ve been wondering about this but don’t watch us enough to really know. Pack and Bacuna seemed to be doing well, then Ralls re appears and gets straight back in and we don’t look nearly as solid or lively.....

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Marlon Pack

      Originally posted by StraightOuttaCanton View Post
      I’ve not been a fan of his but since McCarthy has come, I was very impressed with his performances. Ralls seems to have displaced him and we appear disjointed as a result. Didn’t think I’d say it but based on what I’ve seen I’d now be starting him every week alongside Vaulks
      Me too.
      This especially after Ralls's lackluster performance last week, I was surprised at his inclusion this.

      Perhaps Pack is carrying a knock.
      There are times when we as fans are not party to all that really goes on at the club and particularly on the training ground.

      Vaulks has proved his worth creatively and also chipped in with some excellent goals.

      They would be my pairing in the middle but it is good that we do have options.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Marlon Pack

        I thought Ralls was a lot better today and had a much better game than Vaulks.

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Marlon Pack

          Agreed

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Marlon Pack

            I'd also like us to have an alternative to 343, especially when making subs around the 60/70 minute mark where we use a speedy striker alongside Moore and someone creative just behind such as Williams (or Tomlin once fit).

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Marlon Pack

              Pack should be playing ahead of Ralls in my opinion. He has that ability to slow a game down. Ralls just passes to whoever he can as fast as he can.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Marlon Pack

                He was sorely missed yesterday. I've never been a huge fan of Ralls, and I thought that we'd got him out of the side, then all of a sudden he's back. It was a mistake yesterday.

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Marlon Pack

                  Vaulks is tired and needs a break

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Marlon Pack

                    Originally posted by StraightOuttaCanton View Post
                    I’ve not been a fan of his but since McCarthy has come, I was very impressed with his performances. Ralls seems to have displaced him and we appear disjointed as a result. Didn’t think I’d say it but based on what I’ve seen I’d now be starting him every week alongside Vaulks
                    I think we miss his composure.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Marlon Pack

                      Originally posted by City123 View Post
                      Vaulks is tired and needs a break
                      He'll get a break at the next international matches

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Marlon Pack

                        Playing with only two in central midfield and three at the back was always a bit of a calculated risk, but it worked well for a while even when we were up against a central midfield three. However, City have a high intensity way of playing under Mick McCarthy which puts all of the outfield players bar the back three under a lot of physical pressure. Marlon Packs absence for all but ten minutes of our last two games is a mystery, especially as he had been playing well, but maybe the analysis tools they have these days identified that he was in need of a rest - I’d expect there to be at least one change in central mififor the Stoke match.

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Marlon Pack

                          Originally posted by the other bob wilson View Post
                          Playing with only two in central midfield and three at the back was always a bit of a calculated risk, but it worked well for a while even when we were up against a central midfield three. However, City have a high intensity way of playing under Mick McCarthy which puts all of the outfield players bar the back three under a lot of physical pressure. Marlon Packs absence for all but ten minutes of our last two games is a mystery, especially as he had been playing well, but maybe the analysis tools they have these days identified that he was in need of a rest - I’d expect there to be at least one change in central mififor the Stoke match.
                          Let’s hope there is a good reason as we appear to have slipped away since pack hasn’t started and Ralls has.....

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Marlon Pack

                            Vaulks and Ralls doesn’t work, they are too similar. Needs to be one or the other alongside Pack.

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Marlon Pack

                              Originally posted by J R Hartley View Post
                              Vaulks and Ralls doesn’t work, they are too similar. Needs to be one or the other alongside Pack.
                              And neither of them could pass water.
                              Vaulks is a dreadful footballer, no vision, no passing ability, no composure. The only thing masking his awful performances as a midfield player is his dubious ability to clatter into people and hit a sweet shot once every 12 games. The pair of them should be moved on in the summer and the midfield completely rebuilt.

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X