Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Mr Bates V's the Post Office

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: Mr Bates V's the Post Office

    Originally posted by Cyclops View Post
    This comment ties in with my earlier post about why the sub-postmasters and mistresses didn't appear to do their own basic booking for say 24 hours which would have proved that their Horizon account was being skewed - and then presented this evidence to the courts.

    I haven't seen much mention of something that featured prominently in the ITV series, the deliberate manipulation of Horizon by Fujitsu to manufacture deficits. We hear about gliches in the software, but this was deliberate invasive action and it could only be called a gliche because Fujitsu created a back-door whereby individual accounts could be altered.The purpose being to increase Post Office (and presumably their own) profits
    Apologies. I must have missed your missive. We are of the same mind here, it seems.

    By the way, a certain someone is doing 4 dates in the UK next May....

    Comment


    • Re: Mr Bates V's the Post Office

      Originally posted by Taunton Blue Genie View Post
      Apologies. I must have missed your missive. We are of the same mind here, it seems.

      By the way, a certain someone is doing 4 dates in the UK next May....
      Sitting down throughout and with a nubile chick singer?

      Comment


      • Re: Mr Bates V's the Post Office

        Originally posted by Cyclops View Post
        Sitting down throughout and with a nubile chick singer?
        You mustn't judge everybody using your own standards

        I did see Johnny Winter twice at Wells and Exeter!) and not that long before he died when he was lifted to his stool by two assistants - and he went on to play the most amazing mellow blues set.

        Comment


        • Re: Mr Bates V's the Post Office

          Using the Cherry Ghost tune (People) at the end….covered by Birdy 👍

          Comment


          • Re: Mr Bates V's the Post Office

            Originally posted by Taunton Blue Genie View Post
            You mustn't judge everybody using your own standards
            Quite.
            Last nubile chick singer I sat down with was Donna Lewis.

            Comment


            • Re: Mr Bates V's the Post Office

              I can’t believe the PO was allowed to investigate its own people with its own internal “police force”., and that one of the things that should change immediately. I appreciate money will never compensate for what the post masters/mistresses have been through but they should get at least £1 million each and Fujitsu, never ever be awarded another government contract.

              Comment


              • Re: Mr Bates V's the Post Office

                Originally posted by Dorcus View Post
                The moral of the story is simple: the rich, powerful and prominent members of the establishment are anathema to democracy and can and will wreck lives and livelihoods
                Labour Government knew about it. Never trust computers or is it never trust the government. People who question government policies are often called out a lot of the time.



                The then-PM was told IT system now at the centre of the Post Office scandal was "possibly unreliable".

                Comment


                • Re: Mr Bates V's the Post Office

                  The Post Office could owe £100m in tax too as they were claiming tax relief on compensation payments which you're not allowed to do

                  Comment


                  • Re: Mr Bates V's the Post Office

                    Originally posted by Undercoverinwurzelland View Post
                    The Post Office could owe £100m in tax too as they were claiming tax relief on compensation payments which you're not allowed to do
                    https://twitter.com/DanNeidle/status...20610893434993
                    £935m was mentioned on the radio this morning but I presume this was the figure that tax was being claimed on.

                    Comment


                    • Re: Mr Bates V's the Post Office

                      You’re the only one’ is a common response. Doctors enquiring about thalidomide defects were told that, so were sub postmasters struggling with Horizon.

                      Comment


                      • Re: Mr Bates V's the Post Office

                        There was an IT system before that which needs looking at .

                        System's such as this are brought in for a reason, usually accountability , because of known irregular accounting .

                        Royal Mail has successfully policed itself for decades ..

                        Comment


                        • Re: Mr Bates V's the Post Office

                          Is it yesterday's chip paper yet?

                          Comment


                          • Re: Mr Bates V's the Post Office

                            Originally posted by Wales-Bales View Post
                            Is it yesterday's chip paper yet?
                            No, following it every day

                            There is a lying Scottish barstard in the box today

                            Comment


                            • Re: Mr Bates V's the Post Office

                              Still in papers today, saying earlier it system was faulty as well and they prosecuted innocents then as well. Also until Sunak stepped in they were still at it

                              A range of stories in Thursday's papers including calls from an army chief for the UK to train citizens.


                              Scroll down to I and FT papers

                              Comment


                              • Re: Mr Bates V's the Post Office

                                Originally posted by Rjk View Post
                                they haven't struggled to pay a dividend to their shareholders over the intervening years i see
                                isn't HMG the owner?

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X