Win rate v Entertainment?

[KingOfSiamIAm]

The arguments for keeping or changing the manager seem to fall into two camps… win rate or entertainment.

Not too many people can argue that Dave Jones sides are considered as entertaining teams.

I wonder what the win/draw/loss rate would be if we were to compare this seasons win/draw/loss rate to the overall Dave Jones league rate.

I don’t know what the outcome would be, or what spin anyone can put on it… but I know which type of football I would like to see.

[Hilts]

Re: Win rate v Entertainment?

Unfortunately we dont have players anywhere near the quality of Bothroyd Chopra Whitts Burke McCormack. Throw in Koumas and Bellamy and a young Ramsey as well.

I dont think its anything to do with Dave Jones tactics. Which seemed to be 442 big man little man up top and the players just get on with it.

[WJ99mobile]

Re: Win rate v Entertainment?

It depends if you see the results as luck or the gains as a defensively set up team.

If we don’t see the same results next year it’s just leaving us with dire football.

Unless we drastically improve the quality of the team across the pitch, there won’t be a play off pitch for a number of seasons

[Moodybluebird]

Re: Win rate v Entertainment?

Put it like this. If we were very near the bottom of the league but playing good football, the feeling amongst most fans would be to win ugly if necessary because we desperately need the points.

This season we have been the archetypal mid-table team, so the emphasis is not on survival or possibly promotion, it is on entertainment. Thus, the quality of football becomes the focal point for many fan's discussions and given what's been put before them they generally feel dissatisfied.

For the survival and future prospects of the club you have to put results before entertainment because who wants to follow a League 2 side who play good football but keep getting beat ?

[SLUDGE FACTORY]

Re: Win rate v Entertainment?

Put it like this. If we were very near the bottom of the league but playing good football, the feeling amongst most fans would be to win ugly if necessary because we desperately need the points.

This season we have been the archetypal mid-table team, so the emphasis is not on survival or possibly promotion, it is on entertainment. Thus, the quality of football becomes the focal point for many fan's discussions and given what's been put before them they generally feel dissatisfied.

For the survival and future prospects of the club you have to put results before entertainment because who wants to follow a League 2 side who play good football but keep getting beat ?

Eric

[Grangenders]

Re: Win rate v Entertainment?

Flair players tend to cost money and we’ve had a period of time under and embargo.

For me it’s win at all costs when watching the City. I like entertaining football that’s why I subscribe to most of the sports channels.

[KingOfSiamIAm]

Re: Win rate v Entertainment?

Quality seems to be the word cropping up in the replies.

Dave Jones brought in quality over a period of time, possibly in relative terms on a similar budget? I don’t know.

If the current manager was to build on the quality of player coming in? Obviously we would solid players, but what sort of creative player will he bring in… players like Chopra, Bothroyd, Whitts, Burke, McPhale?

[Dembe]

Re: Win rate v Entertainment?

I am not arsed if we are promoted to The Premier League or not. I am pushing 40, I would rather be entertained if I am giving up my time, otherwise it makes sense to find other things to do that I can get more enjoyment from.

[Dembe]

Re: Win rate v Entertainment?

Put it like this. If we were very near the bottom of the league but playing good football, the feeling amongst most fans would be to win ugly if necessary because we desperately need the points.

This season we have been the archetypal mid-table team, so the emphasis is not on survival or possibly promotion, it is on entertainment. Thus, the quality of football becomes the focal point for many fan's discussions and given what's been put before them they generally feel dissatisfied.

For the survival and future prospects of the club you have to put results before entertainment because who wants to follow a League 2 side who play good football but keep getting beat ?

We could quite easily be the QPR end of the "finished the season safe" camp next year. Only a handful of results need to change. Not going to start taking results away from us but the Ipswich and Southampton are two obvious standout games that 9/10 we don't win but had great moments and walked away with memorable wins. Take the points and league position away for a sec and look at it purely on performances and we have been dire all year long. You don't get away with that over and over again.
The 1 nil win v Birmingham was 50/50
Watford was the bowler goal and absolutely nothing else. We've picked up points we could easily not 9/10 games.
The performances have been consistently bad imo.

[Bobby Dandruff]

Re: Win rate v Entertainment?

Unfortunately we dont have players anywhere near the quality of Bothroyd Chopra Whitts Burke McCormack. Throw in Koumas and Bellamy and a young Ramsey as well.

I dont think its anything to do with Dave Jones tactics. Which seemed to be 442 big man little man up top and the players just get on with it.

I think that it has everything to do with Jones.

He chose the players and set the team up (loosely by all accounts).

The football seemed to be entertaining across all of his time at the club, not just when those players that you mention were playing.

[Moodybluebird]

Re: Win rate v Entertainment?

We could quite easily be the QPR end of the "finished the season safe" camp next year. Only a handful of results need to change. Not going to start taking results away from us but the Ipswich and Southampton are two obvious standout games that 9/10 we don't win but had great moments and walked away with memorable wins. Take the points and league position away for a sec and look at it purely on performances and we have been dire all year long. You don't get away with that over and over again.
The 1 nil win v Birmingham was 50/50
Watford was the bowler goal and absolutely nothing else. We've picked up points we could easily not 9/10 games.
The performances have been consistently bad imo.

We're 15 points clear of the relegation places and who's to say Brum and Huddersfield have not had lucky wins along the way.

No one is denying the performances have been anything other than bad but you can't keep looking at the league table and deducting us points for undeserved wins. Football is not like that and as they say the table never lies.

I don't believe Bulut is satisfied with the performances either. He's an intelligent guy and one can only hope he has taken on board the criticisms levelled at him and his team and put things right for next season if he gets a contract extension.

[Eric the Half a Bee]

Re: Win rate v Entertainment?

The arguments for keeping or changing the manager seem to fall into two camps… win rate or entertainment.

Not too many people can argue that Dave Jones sides are considered as entertaining teams.

I wonder what the win/draw/loss rate would be if we were to compare this seasons win/draw/loss rate to the overall Dave Jones league rate.

I don’t know what the outcome would be, or what spin anyone can put on it… but I know which type of football I would like to see.

Dave Jones:

Played 315 games. 132 wins (41.9%), 99 defeats (31.4%). Goals scored 440 (1.40 per game), goals conceded 377 (1.20 per game).

Erol Bulut:

Played 49 games. 21 wins (42.9%), 23 defeats (46.9%). Goals scored 58 (1.18 per game), goals conceded 77 (1.57 per game).

[Dembe]

Re: Win rate v Entertainment?

We're 15 points clear of the relegation places and who's to say Brum and Huddersfield have not had lucky wins along the way.

No one is denying the performances have been anything other than bad but you can't keep looking at the league table and deducting us points for undeserved wins. Football is not like that and as they say the table never lies.

I don't believe Bulut is satisfied with the performances either. He's an intelligent guy and one can only hope he has taken on board the criticisms levelled at him and his team and put things right for next season if he gets a contract extension.

I didn't mention the relegation places, I pointed out we're only a few wins ahead of teams like QPR and how next season we may not pick up those wins.

The table doesn't lie, I agree, I also think its unsustainable to play this badly this consistently and hope we will get the points we need next season.

I have the opinion that another season with the same performances and the fans will get on top, the players will slowly start to give up, its worked this year because the league position has helped the players and fans (some) buy into it, it only takes one or 2 results to go the other way and to slip down the table and them same players may not be as enthusiastic about what their being asked to do.

My position on Bulut is what it is, pointless me going on and on about it.

[Dembe]

Re: Win rate v Entertainment?

Dave Jones:

Played 315 games. 132 wins (41.9%), 99 defeats (31.4%). Goals scored 440 (1.40 per game), goals conceded 377 (1.20 per game).

Erol Bulut:

Played 49 games. 21 wins (42.9%), 23 defeats (46.9%). Goals scored 58 (1.18 per game), goals conceded 77 (1.57 per game).

Good work. Bulut doesnt keep that win percentage up for 315 games. Not a chance.

[WJ99mobile]

Re: Win rate v Entertainment?

My conspiracy theory is instead of us winning games, we bore the other team into losing.

Clever. Very clever.