Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Washington Air Disaster

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #76
    Re: Washington Air Disaster

    Originally posted by JamesWales View Post
    I sense a lot of what we may incoherently and inconclusively label as "woke" interventionist policies are likely to unravel.

    It's one thing to try and open up opportunities for everyone. Quite another to deny people opportunities based on characteristics they have no control over.

    There's been a few things recently that I have sensed changing. The wind direction definitely feels different.

    Anyway, that's a whole other topic.
    Doesn't sound like you know what woke means.

    Comment


    • #77
      Re: Washington Air Disaster

      Have we signed anybody?

      Comment


      • #78
        Re: Washington Air Disaster

        Originally posted by JamesWales View Post
        There is zero interest in the disaster. It's a proxy for the same people to say the exact same things about the exact same person they've been saying for the last few years. It's pointless.

        Any deviation from that is criticised.
        Are you taking the ****ing piss? Take a look at what you have posted. You know where you want this thread to end up, and you're doing it again with this post. I'll tell you something, you're a nasty piece of work, The mask slipped time ago.

        Comment


        • #79
          Re: Washington Air Disaster

          Originally posted by Eric the Half a Bee View Post
          Doesn't sound like you know what woke means.
          No he does not.

          Comment


          • #80
            Re: Washington Air Disaster

            Another air crash -
            Medical craft crashes into residential area
            The small plane was carrying six people when it crashed, and at least one other person was killed on the ground, officials say.

            Comment


            • #81
              Re: Washington Air Disaster

              Originally posted by the other bob wilson View Post
              Says the person who io being entirely predictable in seeking to justify Trump's gaslighting - Trump, the man who more than once talked about "black jobs" (I suppose they're his idea of positive discrimination) during the election campaign. .

              I know it's the hated BBC and it's all about seeming, gathering and feeling these days, but this fact checking

              He told a news conference that diversity hiring efforts at the Federal Aviation Administration may have led to safety issues.


              shows that the number of people with "targeted disabilities" in the FAA almost tripled between the years 2016 to 2023 to the extent that they now make up a whopping 2 per cent of the workforce. During the same period the percentage of white males employed by the FAA dropped from 59 to 55 per cent. As mentioned above, Trump is gaslighting and let's not forget that when he has a go at anything Obama did as President which is still on the statute books, he's drawing attention. to the fact that he did nothing about it during his first term in the White House.

              I've said in this thread that at least one Democrat politician blamed Trump in the immediate aftermath of the crash and that's as disgusting at what Trump said, but with power comes responsibility and I'd say every President before this one would consider that before wading in with all guns blazing.

              To make out that anyone reacting to Trump's trademark insensitivity is somehow ignoring the tragedy which took place earlier this week is unfair and unjustified - I don't think anyone in this thread is blaming him for what happened, they're reacting to what he appears to see as his main priority post crash.
              No it's about actually getting some commentary on some of the issues being discussed as opposed to just the endless repetitive criticism of him.

              Everyone agrees his comments were appallingly timed. No one disputes that. His advisers will be telling him that and he probably knows it himself but can't help himself.

              But theres numerous reports of hiring policies, court cases, low staff numbers, near misses etc and no one discusses it.. it's just the same tiresome criticism of words. It's so bloody frustrating!

              Comment


              • #82
                Re: Washington Air Disaster

                Originally posted by Eric the Half a Bee View Post
                Doesn't sound like you know what woke means.
                It has several meanings. Which I acknowledged by saying we refer to it incoherently and inconclusively and by writing the word as "woke".

                Comment


                • #83
                  Re: Washington Air Disaster

                  Originally posted by JamesWales View Post
                  No it's about actually getting some commentary on some of the issues being discussed as opposed to just the endless repetitive criticism of him.

                  Everyone agrees his comments were appallingly timed. No one disputes that. His advisers will be telling him that and he probably knows it himself but can't help himself.

                  But theres numerous reports of hiring policies, court cases, low staff numbers, near misses etc and no one discusses it.. it's just the same tiresome criticism of words. It's so bloody frustrating!

                  You’re just gaslighting like Trump and don’t give me that stuff about it being frustrating, you love being the contrarian. Is anyone blaming Trump for what happened in this thread? To use that word again, I see a lot of frustration and bemusement as to how a man like Trump (forget politics, I’m talking about his personality) can be re-elected, that’s re-elected, as President of what is still probably the most powerful country in the world?

                  You’ve told us you would have voted for him (just like you say you’ll vote for Farage) and now you’re trying to turn a thread which was started by someone expressing revulsion at what Trump said and did at that press conference into something else, while trying to convey an impression that you occupy a higher moral ground than those who use this thread for the purpose it was intended.

                  Comment


                  • #84
                    Re: Washington Air Disaster

                    To be fair to James, I can think of a handful of posters who would be all over this thread if it were on the alternative forum. But they won't touch it on the main forum, so at least he is putting his head above the parapets.

                    Comment


                    • #85
                      Re: Washington Air Disaster

                      Originally posted by lardy View Post
                      To be fair to James, I can think of a handful of posters who would be all over this thread if it were on the alternative forum. But they won't touch it on the main forum, so at least he is putting his head above the parapets.
                      Pity someone doesn’t fire off an accurate shot!

                      Comment


                      • #86
                        Re: Washington Air Disaster

                        Originally posted by the other bob wilson View Post
                        You’re just gaslighting like Trump and don’t give me that stuff about it being frustrating, you love being the contrarian. Is anyone blaming Trump for what happened in this thread? To use that word again, I see a lot of frustration and bemusement as to how a man like Trump (forget politics, I’m talking about his personality) can be re-elected, that’s re-elected, as President of what is still probably the most powerful country in the world?

                        You’ve told us you would have voted for him (just like you say you’ll vote for Farage) and now you’re trying to turn a thread which was started by someone expressing revulsion at what Trump said and did at that press conference into something else, while trying to convey an impression that you occupy a higher moral ground than those who use this thread for the purpose it was intended.
                        The thread is about the disaster and Trump bringing DEI into it.

                        No one disputes that Trumps intervention was crass, insensitive and politically unwise etc etc. Everyone has said that. At the very least wait a few days etc etc..

                        But when you look into it:

                        There were staff shortages, both on the night and in recent years

                        The FAA is currently being sued for racial discrimination as 1000 people allegedly didn't get jobs due to their race



                        So the point is that maybe there is some truth in and talking about that might be more useful than everyone repeating what has already been said, and what no one disputes?

                        Trumps words were really bad. But not hiring qualified people due to their bloody skin colour when you have a shortage of air traffic controllers is a damned site worse!

                        Comment


                        • #87
                          Re: Washington Air Disaster

                          Originally posted by JamesWales View Post
                          It has several meanings. Which I acknowledged by saying we refer to it incoherently and inconclusively and by writing the word as "woke".
                          So what is your meaning of it?

                          Comment


                          • #88
                            Re: Washington Air Disaster

                            Originally posted by JamesWales View Post
                            The thread is about the disaster and Trump bringing DEI into it.

                            No one disputes that Trumps intervention was crass, insensitive and politically unwise etc etc. Everyone has said that. At the very least wait a few days etc etc..

                            But when you look into it:

                            There were staff shortages, both on the night and in recent years

                            The FAA is currently being sued for racial discrimination as 1000 people allegedly didn't get jobs due to their race



                            So the point is that maybe there is some truth in and talking about that might be more useful than everyone repeating what has already been said, and what no one disputes?

                            Trumps words were really bad. But not hiring qualified people due to their bloody skin colour when you have a shortage of air traffic controllers is a damned site worse!
                            I think Splott Parker is far better placed to tell us what this thread was intended to be about than you - take away the first sentence and that last paragraph could be Trump talking, you’re doing an awful lot of seeming, gathering and feeling there :hehe:

                            Comment


                            • #89
                              Re: Washington Air Disaster

                              Originally posted by the other bob wilson View Post
                              I think Splott Parker is far better placed to tell us what this thread was intended to be about than you - take away the first sentence and that last paragraph could be Trump talking, you’re doing an awful lot of seeming, gathering and feeling there :hehe:
                              Well the thread is called "Washington Disaster" and the opening words are "Trump blames diversity rules..."

                              So it doesn't take a rocket scientist to work it out.

                              Nor does it take a rocket scientist to spend five minutes reading a couple of articles to see that actually there may be some truth in what he's saying here. You can have another one there.

                              Complaints about the FAA’s hiring policies resurfaced after the American Airlines passenger plane and a Black Hawk helicopter crashed in Washington, DC.

                              Comment


                              • #90
                                Re: Washington Air Disaster

                                Originally posted by Eric the Half a Bee View Post
                                So what is your meaning of it?
                                Id go for the second definition here, particularly the second part of it: "especially in a way that is considered unreasonable or extreme" 👍



                                But language always changes. I've even noticed another use recently, with some of the younger members of staff in work using it as a bit of a joke term for something bad where they've talked about "that orange tastes woke!" Or "that player is totally woke".

                                It is interesting how language evolves and means different things to different people, hence describing it as I did earlier.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X