Nathan Trott

[Pedro de la Rosa]

Re: Nathan Trott

It's a yes from me. Sign him.

Kellyman also I think if a decent price with Chelsea can be negotiated.

Kellyman is going to be worth about 15m on Chelsea's books. Best we can hope for is another loan

[Bobby Dandruff]

Re: Nathan Trott

This man deserves a thread of his own, that’s what I reckon. Outstanding, fast becoming one of the City’s best ever signings. We’re top of the league because of him in my opinion.

When we signed Trott I was completely underwhelmed as I often am about new keepers. (was he BBM’s first signing?)

But I was totally wrong, as he has been absolutely superb (and I don’t even care about the goal away at Orient!).

The problem now is of course that unless we had a pre-agreed buy price in his loan agreement, then his market value will have sky rocketed :-/

[Coyote]

Re: Nathan Trott

Kellyman is going to be worth about 15m on Chelsea's books. Best we can hope for is another loan

There was speculation the reason they paid so much for him from Villa is because both sides were trying to do FFP chicanery to balance their books.

Kellyman is great, but he's not 15m great. Only player who maybe qualifies for that in League One is Ballard IMO. You could make the case for Lawlor I guess.

[Heathblue]

Re: Nathan Trott

Trott had a fine game yesterday.

[RichardM]

Re: Nathan Trott

I'd be pretty sure that personnal terms were either agreed or to be agreed.

Or not agreed and he doesn't sign.

[Hilts]

Re: Nathan Trott

Trott had a fine game yesterday.

He was at fault for their goal.

But it made no difference and he won us the point v Huddersfield with some great saves.

[NinianKnight]

Re: Nathan Trott

It's a yes from me. Sign him.

Kellyman also I think if a decent price with Chelsea can be negotiated.

I am pretty sure it was reported that Kellyman won't be coming back as he is looking to break through at Chelsea.

But it the hope that might be wrong what would be a decent price?

[ToTaL ITK]

Re: Nathan Trott

I am pretty sure it was reported that Kellyman won't be coming back as he is looking to break through at Chelsea.

But it the hope that might be wrong what would be a decent price?

He's no where near a Chelsea place, a season or two in the champ would serve him well ( with us )

[Pedro de la Rosa]

Re: Nathan Trott

He was at fault for their goal.

But it made no difference and he won us the point v Huddersfield with some great saves.

No he wasn't

[MOZZER2]

Re: Nathan Trott

He's very much not pretty spot on

usually is

[Pedro de la Rosa]

Re: Nathan Trott

usually is

He really isn't. He's full of shit. He throws loads of shit at the wall, some of it sticks and he deletes the posts where he looks a tart

[Trigger]

Re: Nathan Trott

No he wasn't

He pushed a relatively comfortable save to their player, good finish from there still but he played a part. Looks like he is trying to push it further to his left but just doesn't get it right.

No big deal, he made other saves that helped us and overall this season is well in credit.

[Pedro de la Rosa]

Re: Nathan Trott

He pushed a relatively comfortable save to their player, good finish from there still but he played a part. Looks like he is trying to push it further to his left but just doesn't get it right.

No big deal, he made other saves that helped us and overall this season is well in credit.

Willock didn't track his man at all