GLAMMY

[soulsurfer3]

Re: GLAMMY

Yep Glammy on top. Let’s bowl them out for 300 and then build a big lead. Not sure I would want to see Lloyd enforce the follow on as batting fourth on a wearing pitch will be tricky.

If the pitch is wearing and Worc. don`t get a foothold I think a lead of 150 is realistic, but it needs a strong fielding effort to see it through, we have given away 28 extras off 69 already. Wayward bowling or pitch again ? I saw Worc. gave away 32extras off 120.

[Lord Worcester]

Re: GLAMMY

If the pitch is wearing and Worc. don`t get a foothold I think a lead of 150 is realistic, but it needs a strong fielding effort to see it through, we have given away 28 extras off 69 already. Wayward bowling or pitch again ? I saw Worc. gave away 32extras off 120.

And 14 of them no balls. Very unlike glammy. But overall you would definitely have taken this position after 2 days. Press on tomorrow with the remaining 5 wickets.

[soulsurfer3]

Re: GLAMMY

And 14 of them no balls. Very unlike glammy. But overall you would definitely have taken this position after 2 days. Press on tomorrow with the remaining 5 wickets.

Yeah, bowling has been much tighter this season, that`s why it is sticking out like a sore thumb today. Maybe a few No Balls got smashed for boundries ?

[Llanedeyrnblue]

Re: GLAMMY

One wicket needed 147 in front

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cricket/scorecard/ECKO44895

[Pearcey3]

Re: GLAMMY

It’s been a poor effort this afternoon. No urgency at all. This is drifting towards a draw although we would still pick up a healthy 13 points from the game.

[chrisp_1927]

Re: GLAMMY

So frustrating. We've let a really poor player make match defining contributions in both innings. Really thought we were in position to win this, going to be very difficult from here now.

[chrisp_1927]

Re: GLAMMY

one positive. Sussex need a miracle to avoid defeat in their game. while lancs have slipped to a poor position against Durham

[Don Corleone]

Re: GLAMMY

A 79 run lead but the last pair added over 60 runs so should have been so much better. You would say this is going to be a draw but if we can get some quick runs on the board the rest of the day it might put quite some pressure on Worcester on the final day. Will Glammy risk an early declaration to try and go for the win or bat on to ensure the draw?

[chrisp_1927]

Re: GLAMMY

A 79 run lead but the last pair added over 60 runs so should have been so much better. You would say this is going to be a draw but if we can get some quick runs on the board the rest of the day it might put quite some pressure on Worcester on the final day. Will Glammy risk an early declaration to try and go for the win or bat on to ensure the draw?

Would love to see some real attacking intent, 2 big sessions and declare at lunch, I suppose a lot depends on the top 3 and the start they give us

[jon1959]

Re: GLAMMY

Would love to see some real attacking intent, 2 big sessions and declare at lunch, I suppose a lot depends on the top 3 and the start they give us

Hmmmm. Not going well so far!

1 - 1 after one over. Morgan departs.

[chrisp_1927]

Re: GLAMMY

Hmmmm. Not going well so far!

1 - 1 after one over. Morgan departs.

At least it gets Marnus to the wicket earlier I suppose 😁

[Pearcey3]

Re: GLAMMY

Labuschagne in brilliant form again and reaches 1000 runs for the season. Miles ahead of the rest. When was the last time a Glammy player scored 100 runs by 2nd July? We should have a lead of around 240 by close of play. Look to bat for 90 minutes tomorrow and then try and bowl them out. It will be tough to pull off a win from here.

[the other bob wilson]

Re: GLAMMY

Glamorgan 137-1 at the close, 216 in front. Only six wickets fell today on another Cardiff pitch which seems to have got easier the longer the game has gone on - hopefully, there can still be a positive result, but I think the pitches for our home games so far have been pretty disappointing so far and another draw has to be favourite at the moment.

[splott parker]

Re: GLAMMY

[QUOTE=Pearcey3 When was the last time a Glammy player scored 100 runs by 2nd July? [/QUOTE]

Well there’s no need to be that critical Pearcey lad 🤪

[the other bob wilson]

Re: GLAMMY

It certainly felt like no one reached 100 runs by July last season.