Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

GLAMMY

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: GLAMMY

    Originally posted by Pearcey3 View Post
    The bowlers have done very well. Let's hope the openers and middle order get some runs for a change
    Might well be worth a look some time tomorrow if I can manage to sneak a couple of hours. Probably all I will need, or should I say all I can take

    Comment


    • Re: GLAMMY

      Thats brave. Hope you see some decent batting although if our captain his still getting it certainly won't be a run fest.
      The game is now nicely poised.

      Comment


      • Re: GLAMMY

        Think we got a bit lucky because it clouded over for a couple of hours when Sussex were batting and then brightened up again when Glamorgan started their second innings. Still, credit to Glamorgan's bowlers for sticking to their task when it looked like they were going to concede a lead of a couple of hundred - it's anyone's game now and at least Selman ended his run of noughts.

        Comment


        • Re: GLAMMY

          71-1 rain stopped play

          Comment


          • Re: GLAMMY

            Originally posted by Llanedeyrnblue View Post
            71-1 rain stopped play
            The weather appears to have done for this game. Such a shame as Glammy were well set.

            Comment


            • Re: GLAMMY

              They did comeback and got to 149-2 but as you say the game looks over

              Comment


              • Re: GLAMMY

                Sussex 37-1 chasing 233

                Comment


                • Re: GLAMMY

                  Originally posted by Llanedeyrnblue View Post
                  Sussex 37-1 chasing 233
                  Ninety odd for two at tea. Sussex's first innings collapse gives Glamorgan some hope, but they should win from here and, if they do, it will be down to yet more substandard batting by Glamorgan's top order - to have four of the top five get past forty, but none of them reach sixty is just not good enough.

                  Comment


                  • Re: GLAMMY

                    Glammy should have set 280 for Sussex to win but this time a lower order collapse. Can't see a win from here.

                    Comment


                    • Re: GLAMMY

                      Originally posted by Pearcey3 View Post
                      Glammy should have set 280 for Sussex to win but this time a lower order collapse. Can't see a win from here.
                      Glamorgan went too hard too early at Sussex. However with a draw no use to either side really it was understandable.

                      Comment


                      • Re: GLAMMY

                        Originally posted by qccfc View Post
                        Glamorgan went too hard too early at Sussex. However with a draw no use to either side really it was understandable.
                        Agreed, you take more risks and pay the price sometimes, draw no good to either.
                        To be fair though, the pitch is doing loads and the weather's been so inclement that the four TOBW mentioned , in my opinion, did pretty well to make the runs they did.
                        I was at the session before lunch yesterday when Rudolph got out and 2 or 3 Ingram boundaries apart, Sussex could have picked up 3 or 4 wkts.
                        The sun is shining bright now and Sussex should knock them off but the bowlers are still beating the bat. Never know.

                        Comment


                        • Re: GLAMMY

                          Sussex need 104 to win with 6 wkts left

                          Comment


                          • Re: GLAMMY

                            128-5, getting interesting.

                            Comment


                            • Re: GLAMMY

                              Originally posted by the other bob wilson View Post
                              128-5, getting interesting.
                              137/6. Glammy favourites.

                              Comment


                              • Re: GLAMMY

                                Briggs has played and missed about 6 times with one decent scoring shot for his twenty

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X