GLAMMY

[mrbluejay]

Re: GLAMMY

33 / 1

[willo1927]

Re: GLAMMY

Has anyone told Selman you're suppose to miss the fielders when you hit the ball.
He is timing it well but hits the cover fielder every time.
22 from 51 balls is ridiculous
Hope he bats on and gets a big score now

[Majorblue]

Re: GLAMMY

Glamorgan very much in this with the wickets in hand but they need to start finding the gaps and quickly.
Disappointing but understandably small crowd.
Still say they should have found a gap in the schedule to play it at Lord’s ,on a Saturday, in front of a full house.

[Eric Cartman]

Re: GLAMMY

Kiran has really stepped on the accelerator here at the right time. He is often out when he starts to dominate though so just got to cross the fingers that he can make it through a few more overs to set us up nicely.

[willo1927]

Re: GLAMMY

Ffs Selman

[Dave Blue]

Re: GLAMMY

Glamorgan very much in this with the wickets in hand but they need to start finding the gaps and quickly.
Disappointing but understandably small crowd.
Still say they should have found a gap in the schedule to play it at Lord’s ,on a Saturday, in front of a full house.

From my recollection the finals against Gloucester and Notts were nowhere near full houses but I take your point about a Saturday.

[Elwood Blues]

Re: GLAMMY

157- 5 now

Selman, Root and Carlson all gone in quick succession. Carlson the real blow as he was playing very well

TV Replay shows that the ball for Root's LBW pitched outside leg stump but didn't review ( I presume reviews are allowed in the Royal London.

It was looking like they would get over 300. That will be a struggle now.

[Dave Blue]

Re: GLAMMY

They’ve all got out when an acceleration was on the cards. Slowed up trying to rebuild. Frustrating.

[MacAdder]

Re: GLAMMY

They’ve all got out when an acceleration was on the cards. Slowed up trying to rebuild. Frustrating.

Yep.
Now batting the overs out will be on the minds.

[Undercoverinwurzelland]

Re: GLAMMY

Every time a partnership is building Durham take a wicket. Frustrating.

[Pearcey3]

Re: GLAMMY

We need to ensure we bat the full fifty overs. At 157/2 we should have been looking at over 300. Selman didn’t need to take a risk at that stage. The pitch looks flat and the outfield quick so we really need 300 on the board but that’s looking unlikely

[MacAdder]

Re: GLAMMY

Looking very very unlikely now, Weighell looked in good form too.
Frustrating.

[Seabird]

Re: GLAMMY

Hogan is a real character. Not bad for a 40-y-o.

[Michael Morris]

Re: GLAMMY

296/9 after 50 overs

[MacAdder]

Re: GLAMMY

Hogan has more work to do yet but take 296 especially since he came in.

I'd say outside chance.