GLAMMY

[poc]

Re: GLAMMY

Done well there, chase of 165 to win. Helped a bit by Evison having to bat down the order. All in all a very good first 3 innings of the game for Glamorgan.

Should be a relatively comfortable chase. Decent deck, good top order. C'mon glammy !

played well so far this would be a great win and 23pts

[Lord Worcester]

Re: GLAMMY

played well so far this would be a great win and 23pts

Cmon glammy

[xsnaggle]

Re: GLAMMY

42 -1 Salter lbw 16

[the other bob wilson]

Re: GLAMMY

52-2, Lloyd gone.

[Don Corleone]

Re: GLAMMY

52-2, Lloyd gone.

They’re not going to make this easy are they!

[Pearcey3]

Re: GLAMMY

Bad time to lose Lloyd just before lunch. We need Labuschagne to stick around.

[the other bob wilson]

Re: GLAMMY

Second century of the season for Bracey of Gloucestershire and Haines of Sussex is 203 not out, a couple of possible England players doing well there.

There’s a possibility of a remarkable achievement at Canterbury where Kent opener Ben Compton (Dennis Compton’s grand son), having carried his bat in the first innings is still in second time around with seven wickets down - I’m sure an opener has batted right through both innings some time before in cricket, but, having been a fan of the game since the mid sixties, I’m not sure it’s happened in the domestic game in all of that time.

[the other bob wilson]

Re: GLAMMY

They’re not going to make this easy are they!

No, Chrisp has more faith in our batting than I have

[chrisp_1927]

Re: GLAMMY

It could go spectacularly wrong . But the way I see it, we needed 166, knocked off 52 of those for 2 wickets. After lunch at 1 end we have the best batsman in world cricket, at the other a bloke coming off 85 in the first innings. It ain't over til it's over, but we're in one hell of a position. Just wish I was in Nottingham, sitting in the sun with a few beers down me !!!!

[chrisp_1927]

Re: GLAMMY

12 off an over by the spinner to put us right in charge, followed by athe 2icket of Northeast next over. Need this or the next partnership to bring us home now .

[Rjk]

Re: GLAMMY

Carlson not taking his time then

[chrisp_1927]

Re: GLAMMY

Not sure if the stats back this up or not, but Carlson seems to be a much better 2nd innings player than first. Always seems to stand up and score a lot of runs in the 2nd innings. Maybe its down to him preferring the spinners (his footwork is fantastic). Or maybe it's just chance

[chrisp_1927]

Re: GLAMMY

Huge 6 by Carlson to win it !! Absolutely brilliant by Glamorgan

[Undercoverinwurzelland]

Re: GLAMMY

Great win. Top of the league.

[poc]

Re: GLAMMY

eggscellent win