Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

GLAMMY

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: GLAMMY

    Originally posted by the other bob wilson View Post
    258 all out, Neser 86.
    and 3 quick ones - is this the elusive 1st win?

    Comment


    • Re: GLAMMY

      4 down. Needed that 1. 2 for McClroy

      Comment


      • Re: GLAMMY

        6 down. VdG with 4. Surely?

        Comment


        • Re: GLAMMY

          Phew

          Comment


          • Re: GLAMMY

            Worcestershire 227 all out, Van Der Gugten’s third five wicket haul of the season.

            Glamorgan need 79 to win.

            Comment


            • Re: GLAMMY

              Let’s hope there’s no panic chasing 79 down.
              I’ve been watching the Middlesex v Surrey game on Sky this morning. I know I’m in the minority but oh to watch some real cricket rather than the wham bam thank you ma’am of 20.20. I’d have paid good money just to watch the wicketkeeping of Simpson the Middlesex keeper this morning. It’s been an absolute treat to watch for a former keeper like me this morning.

              Comment


              • Re: GLAMMY

                Originally posted by the other bob wilson View Post
                Worcestershire 227 all out, Van Der Gugten’s third five wicket haul of the season.

                Glamorgan need 79 to win.
                12/0.

                OK may only be our first win if we get the runs but 5 championship matches and undefeated is pretty bloody good by glamorgan standards. Progress.

                Comment


                • Re: GLAMMY

                  Taylor made for a classic Glammy capitulation.
                  Hopefully not though.

                  Comment


                  • Re: GLAMMY

                    Originally posted by Majorblue View Post
                    Taylor made for a classic Glammy capitulation.
                    Hopefully not though.
                    Thank God then that Worcs haven’t got a player named Taylor.

                    Comment


                    • Re: GLAMMY

                      Glam Win by 10 wickets

                      Comment


                      • Re: GLAMMY

                        Good all round performance, bowlers especially.

                        Comment


                        • Re: GLAMMY

                          We’re second currently, but Sussex look well placed to beat Leicestershire and Durham at the top should beat Yorkshire, so we can’t really afford to lose at Hove next week.

                          Good win today, Van Der Gugten must be in the top three wicket takers in the country.

                          Comment


                          • Re: GLAMMY

                            Maybe I spoke too soon about Durham winning, a bit of a clatter of wickets and they need 92 with 5 wickets left - make that four.

                            Comment


                            • Re: GLAMMY

                              Originally posted by the other bob wilson View Post
                              Maybe I spoke too soon about Durham winning, a bit of a clatter of wickets and they need 92 with 5 wickets left - make that four.
                              Need 33 with 2 wickets left when they restart tomorrow

                              Comment


                              • Re: GLAMMY

                                Originally posted by Father Dougal View Post
                                Need 33 with 2 wickets left when they restart tomorrow
                                Yes, I’ll have a look at that in the morning. Not sure what would be the best outcome for Glamorgan.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X