GLAMMY

[Taffy Blue in Berkshire]

Re: GLAMMY

farcical and yes Carlson is a clown!

[chrisp_1927]

Re: GLAMMY

I may have been slightly harsh on him. Didn't realise Alleyne had sent us into a game with 4 bowlers. Is it asking too much to have a T20 coach who isn't a complete moron when it comes to the game. So frustrating!

[Taffy Blue in Berkshire]

Re: GLAMMY

Carlson out with a dull shot

[the other bob wilson]

Re: GLAMMY

I may have been slightly harsh on him. Didn't realise Alleyne had sent us into a game with 4 bowlers. Is it asking too much to have a T20 coach who isn't a complete moron when it comes to the game. So frustrating!

Have they got five fit bowlers?

[chrisp_1927]

Re: GLAMMY

Have they got five fit bowlers?

There's the 2 Andys . Gorvin was on as a sub and salter isn't being picked. Also though Prem was in the squad, but not picked

[billy.ronson]

Re: GLAMMY

There's the 2 Andys . Gorvin was on as a sub and salter isn't being picked. Also though Prem was in the squad, but not picked

Just got home ,Van Der Gugten went for 64 off 4 overs !!! Once Cooke and Ingram got out it was all over . Almost like having our tail start at 5 as no big hitters and score always felt about 30 too many

[Pearcey3]

Re: GLAMMY

An enjoyable evening at the Gardens. A good sized crowd.
Very similar to Surrey. Our bowling is very weak and we rely far too much on Ingram and Cooke in the batting.
I thought Carlson’s field placings were very poor especially when Pepper repeatedly reverse hit the bowlers with no one standing far enough back.
TVG had a nightmare.

[The Bloop]

Re: GLAMMY

Better bowlers/bowling would've kept the score around 190-200, then we might have had a chance. The collapse from overs 12/13 just shows how reliant we've been on 3 or 4 players recently.

[the other bob wilson]

Re: GLAMMY

Looking at our squad, we’ll have done extremely well if we’re still unbeaten in four day cricket come Thursday.

https://glamorgancricket.com/news/glamorgan-return-to-county-championship-action-against-durham

[Harry Lime]

Re: GLAMMY

An enjoyable evening at the Gardens. A good sized crowd.
Very similar to Surrey. Our bowling is very weak and we rely far too much on Ingram and Cooke in the batting.
I thought Carlson’s field placings were very poor especially when Pepper repeatedly reverse hit the bowlers with no one standing far enough back.
TVG had a nightmare.

It was my first trip up there for some time, got a good deal on tickets and had a great evening. Totally agree with your summary, I said to my friend after the first 4 overs that we were out of it already.

[the other bob wilson]

Re: GLAMMY

Glamorgan, opening up with Salter and Ul Hassan, 41-0 after winning the toss - McIlroy and Horton have been left out from the thirteen that travelled north.

[chrisp_1927]

Re: GLAMMY

Hoping McIlroy is rested rather than injured.

[Rontomuk]

Re: GLAMMY

89 for 3 at lunch

[the other bob wilson]

Re: GLAMMY

89 for 3 at lunch

Yeah, they were going well at around 70-1 with Salter playing his best innings as an opener so far, but those two quick wickets for Durham turned things around and so I’d just about make it their session.

[chrisp_1927]

Re: GLAMMY

Good partnership by Carlson and northeast so far. If these 2 can bat for another hour or 2 we will be in a very strong position