GLAMMY

[Pearcey3]

Re: GLAMMY

How much better was that? Ingram and Cooke are high quality players and proved that today. They showed real grit and determination to bat through the entire day.

[Alfonso Perez]

Re: GLAMMY

Credit to Ingram & Cooke for a really good effort to save the game. Also credit to those who sat through it as at less than 2.5 per over it must have been a pretty boring spectacle

[Pearcey3]

Re: GLAMMY

Credit to Ingram & Cooke for a really good effort to save the game. Also credit to those who sat through it as at less than 2.5 per over it must have been a pretty boring spectacle

Yep painfully slow. Usually Glammy score at 4/5 an over but get bowled out inside 60 overs. This was proper batting today.

[Majorblue]

Re: GLAMMY

Remarkable draw and I certainly didn't see that coming.
Maybe something to build on?

[Llanedeyrnblue]

Re: GLAMMY

When was the last time glammy batted all day and never lost a wicket?

[Pearcey3]

Re: GLAMMY

When was the last time glammy batted all day and never lost a wicket?

Before you and I were born

[qccfc]

Re: GLAMMY

Rudolph retiring at end of season, stepping down as captain of LVCC, with Hogan taking over. Rudolph will still captain in the T20.

[the other bob wilson]

Re: GLAMMY

Rudolph retiring at end of season, stepping down as captain of LVCC, with Hogan taking over. Rudolph will still captain in the T20.

I see Hogan's only captain for the rest of the season - I wonder if we'll see a new captain brought in from outside the club?

[Pearcey3]

Re: GLAMMY

I see Hogan's only captain for the rest of the season - I wonder if we'll see a new captain brought in from outside the club?

I think we will. Hogan has been a great player but is past his best now and he is bound to retire at the end of next season.

[the other bob wilson]

Re: GLAMMY

Glamorgan were set 266 in 51 overs by Durham and they were going pretty well, but they've just lost Ingram.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cricket/scorecard/ECKO41326

[rich munn]

Re: GLAMMY

Glamorgan were set 266 in 51 overs by Durham and they were going pretty well, but they've just lost Ingram.

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cricket/scorecard/ECKO41326

Glammy won by 3 wickets!

267-7.

Opener Selman 116 not out.

Brilliant.

[jon1959]

Re: GLAMMY

Wow.

[Llanedeyrnblue]

Re: GLAMMY

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cricket/scorecard/ECKO41333

Not a bad start V Worcestershire

[Llanedeyrnblue]

Re: GLAMMY

http://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cricket/scorecard/ECKO41333

Not a bad start V Worcestershire

FFS

At least Rudolf is playing well at last

[Pearcey3]

Re: GLAMMY

FFS

At least Rudolf is playing well at last

Yep a typical collapse.