GLAMMY

[Dave Blue]

Re: GLAMMY

dickson replaced him as a substitute

Allegedly

[the other bob wilson]

Re: GLAMMY

Good to see Asa Tribe making runs as Glamorgan have been set a massive 478 at Notts. He’s 59 not out with us 83-1 as play is suspended through rain. Actually, just watching the Forest game and Alan Smith was saying there was sleet or hail coming down.

[Madassa]

Re: GLAMMY

Day 3 finished with Glammy 132\2, Tribe on 82. Decent enough but need a big innings from him if we're going to get anything out of this game.

[Don Corleone]

Re: GLAMMY

Day 3 finished with Glammy 132\2, Tribe on 82. Decent enough but need a big innings from him if we're going to get anything out of this game.

Decent effort today, especially from Tribe but will be amazed if we survive a full day tomorrow

[the other bob wilson]

Re: GLAMMY

Decent effort today, especially from Tribe but will be amazed if we survive a full day tomorrow

Agreed, I was hoping for a bit more help from the weather, but the forecast is for it to be dry all day in Nottingham.

[jon1959]

Re: GLAMMY

The fat lady is about to sing!

[the other bob wilson]

Re: GLAMMY

Until Crane came in, no Glamorgan batsman had managed more than 25 apart from Tribe. Still early days, but the opinion that our four day batting is weaker than last season is beginning to look justified - Byrom couldn’t get in the side last season and yet he’s opening now, there’s nothing in Zain Ul Hassan’s career so far to suggest he can bat in the top three of a First Division team and Dickson is a step down from Northeast in the four day game at least.

[Lord Worcester]

Re: GLAMMY

The bowling has options. The batting already looks a worry. Unlucky to lose kellaway.

[Pearcey3]

Re: GLAMMY

The bowling has options. The batting already looks a worry. Unlucky to lose kellaway.

Kellaway was a big loss. The team dipped without him at the back end of last season

[dandywarhol]

Re: GLAMMY

It's going to be a long season in Division one

[the other bob wilson]

Re: GLAMMY

Glamorgan 91-4 at lunch. Surprised they opted to bat on winning the toss as that score suggests it’s a typical modern day Cardiff wicket whereby ~the team batting first concedes a pretty big first innings lead and often ends up losing. I’ve not watched any of this morning’s play, so don’t know what the pitch is like, maybe they’re expecting it to break up and favour spin in the fourth innings?

[Don Corleone]

Re: GLAMMY

Glamorgan 91-4 at lunch. Surprised they opted to bat on winning the toss as that score suggests it’s a typical modern day Cardiff wicket whereby ~the team batting first concedes a pretty big first innings lead and often ends up losing. I’ve not watched any of this morning’s play, so don’t know what the pitch is like, maybe they’re expecting it to break up and favour spin in the fourth innings?

Byron and ul Hussain both failed yet again, they were not good enough in Div 2 as openers so not sure why it was thought they would be effective in Div 1

[Elwood Blues]

Re: GLAMMY

150-4 now

Dickson getting some runs for the first time.

[Pearcey3]

Re: GLAMMY

Byron and ul Hussain both failed yet again, they were not good enough in Div 2 as openers so not sure why it was thought they would be effective in Div 1

Just about to post this. Neither is good enough. It really is a problem. An ongoing excellent 8th wicket stand has brought us back into this at 327/7.

[the other bob wilson]

Re: GLAMMY

334-7 at the close, 90s for Carlson and Dickson and Crane is closing in on his half century. It looks a flat wicket now mind.