GLAMMY

[Elwood Blues]

Re: GLAMMY

This is tighter than we deserved thanks to Hogan

[Taffy Blue in Berkshire]

Re: GLAMMY

gutted! poor Hogan had no support.

[Taffy Blue in Berkshire]

Re: GLAMMY

Even Ed Bevan commented on the crap bowling support.

[Pearcey3]

Re: GLAMMY

With decent captaincy we win that game. Really really poor from Lloyd. What was he thinking? Let’s hope he learns from this.
There needs to be a discussion with Michael Hogan about staying on for another season. Absolutely stunning from him. We had no right to still be in that game at the end.

[chrisp_1927]

Re: GLAMMY

With decent captaincy we win that game. Really really poor from Lloyd. What was he thinking? Let’s hope he learns from this.
There needs to be a discussion with Michael Hogan about staying on for another season. Absolutely stunning from him. We had no right to still be in that game at the end.

Only bit I disagree with is another season , needs to be at least 2 or 3 seasons !!

[Taffy Blue in Berkshire]

Re: GLAMMY

With decent captaincy we win that game. Really really poor from Lloyd. What was he thinking? Let’s hope he learns from this.
There needs to be a discussion with Michael Hogan about staying on for another season. Absolutely stunning from him. We had no right to still be in that game at the end.

Lloyd hasn't done that well with his batting either and dropped a dolly catch. Think Sunday will be tough.

[Taffy Blue in Berkshire]

Re: GLAMMY

shame Sunday's match isn't at Lords 'cos Radlett is a right pain to get to.

[Pearcey3]

Re: GLAMMY

Only bit I disagree with is another season , needs to be at least 2 or 3 seasons !!

Will gladly put my hand in my wallet if the buckets are around Sophia Gardens next week. He should have been on the winning side tonight. A bit disappointed with Neser. He has looked very ordinary in T20 and very much second best compared with his compatriot.

[Taffy Blue in Berkshire]

Re: GLAMMY

Will gladly put my hand in my wallet if the buckets are around Sophia Gardens next week. He should have been on the winning side tonight. A bit disappointed with Neser. He has looked very ordinary in T20 and very much second best compared with his compatriot.

why didn't Marnus bowl another over?

[Pearcey3]

Re: GLAMMY

why didn't Marnus bowl another over?

Yep. A good second over and then taken off. Surrey were still favourites when Sisodiya was brought back on. That was the crucial over. Had Hogan bowled it they would have struggled to pick up many and the pressure was then on. Very frustrating.

[chrisp_1927]

Re: GLAMMY

Surprised Joe Cooke or Lloyd didn't have at least an over.

[Pearcey3]

Re: GLAMMY

Surprised Joe Cooke or Lloyd didn't have at least an over.

Yep. Cooke can be expensive but does take wickets. Sisodiya 2 overs for 29 and brought back to bowl again. Surrey got away with that.

[Taffy Blue in Berkshire]

Re: GLAMMY

I was up at the Oval for the game a few years back when we scored over 220 with Cooke and Ingram battering 6s all over the place. I honestly though we would have had Ingram playing tonight as the Oval is clearly a batting track. Our total should have been closer to 200 this evening.

[Pearcey3]

Re: GLAMMY

I was up at the Oval for the game a few years back when we scored over 220 with Cooke and Ingram battering 6s all over the place. I honestly though we would have had Ingram playing tonight as the Oval is clearly a batting track. Our total should have been closer to 200 this evening.

Ingram hasn’t done much for a few seasons. I would prefer Neser as our second overseas player. Labuschagne will be leaving halfway through T20 so Ingram will come into the side.

[the other bob wilson]

Re: GLAMMY

Lloyd really should have taken that catch and who knows what would have happened if he had done, but I think that if those two teams played each other ten times, Surrey would win seven or eight of them - we were competitive against many peoples favourites to win the Blast, that’s progress on the previous couple of seasons.