Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

GLAMMY

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: GLAMMY

    I was out last night and had the wickets notifications coming through on the phone, couldn’t believe it when the result came through. Dear me.

    Free tickets for the Oval later. Lovely day in London atm which I’m sure Glamorgan will do their best to spoil come the evening 😂. Used to be a bit of a happy hunting ground for us in the t20 for a stretch but going to be a tall order tonight one feels.

    Comment


    • Re: GLAMMY

      Last night was gutting. Everything has been said above. But we do have the chance to go again tonight. On paper oval, along with Taunton, are the toughest games but we’ve often done well. Get some bloody positivity in them somehow, and grab a win. Sam northeast is a quality cricketer. No debate. But 40 off 40 simply ain’t good enough even at Cardiff. Drop him tonight, get billy in - always liked his positive attitude, and open with Marnus. We have had some excellent individual performances - crane, vdG and some batters - now let’s stick it together. Come on glammy!!

      Comment


      • Re: GLAMMY

        I’d blame Northeast for his dropped catch, but not for his innings. That was not a good wicket and I’d say Glamorgan would not have got what should have been a winning score without his innings. Glamorgan were winning that game for the first sixteen overs of the Gloucestershire innings and they lost because Douthwaite, McIlroy and Gorvin bowled like drains in their final overs (to be fair, the last named was very good until then) and Carlson, McIlroy and Northeast dropped easy catches by the standards of the professional game - you can rave about Labuschagne’s catch, but Glamorgan’s general standard of catching in the last few weeks has been appalling, as bad as I can remember from a Glamorgan team.

        Comment


        • Re: GLAMMY

          Games as good as gone. But that Surrey sideline reporter certainly cheered me up. She may aswell not have been wearing a top. Poor old Kumar didn't know where to look

          Comment


          • Re: GLAMMY

            I take the one change from last night’s shambles - new boy Sole for Van Der Gugten is down to injury, an absolutely bonkers decision if it isn’t.

            Comment


            • Re: GLAMMY

              Originally posted by the other bob wilson View Post
              I take the one change from last night’s shambles - new boy Sole for Van Der Gugten is down to injury, an absolutely bonkers decision if it isn’t.
              Being rested according to the glam website. Along with byrom and podmore, although they seem to have been resting for a while !!

              Comment


              • Re: GLAMMY

                Originally posted by chrisp_1927 View Post
                Being rested according to the glam website. Along with byrom and podmore, although they seem to have been resting for a while !!
                So they’ve given up on qualifying then, I suppose that’s realistic.

                Comment


                • Re: GLAMMY

                  Don't think we're going to win this one either.

                  Comment


                  • Re: GLAMMY

                    thank feck we didn't go to the Oval. seen great games there in the past.

                    Comment


                    • Re: GLAMMY

                      Every part of their game is a shambles. There are 2 types of results at the moment, losses we should have won and absolute thumping embarrassments.

                      Comment


                      • Re: GLAMMY

                        Originally posted by Dave Blue View Post
                        Every part of their game is a shambles. There are 2 types of results at the moment, losses we should have won and absolute thumping embarrassments.
                        Wow - 108/1 9 overs !!!!

                        Comment


                        • Re: GLAMMY

                          heads should roll! unacceptable

                          Comment


                          • Re: GLAMMY

                            Small grumble about how slow we scored . I'd have rather seen us shot out for 60 trying to attack than crawling to just over 100. But on the whole I find that game a lot easier to take than the rest of our defeats.
                            Bad performance , we lost, that happens.

                            Comment


                            • Re: GLAMMY

                              Well, at least I didn’t have to pay for the tickets tonight.

                              Comment


                              • Re: GLAMMY

                                Originally posted by chrisp_1927 View Post
                                Games as good as gone. But that Surrey sideline reporter certainly cheered me up. She may aswell not have been wearing a top. Poor old Kumar didn't know where to look
                                best interview pity she cant get a job at the euros

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X