Kyle Rittenhouse

[Llandaff Blue]

Re: Kyle Rittenhouse

Pleasure. Hopefully, it enabled you to realise how stupid yours was.

Sure thing

[Croesy Blue]

Re: Kyle Rittenhouse

What’s mad is people think it’s fine that he shot these because it’s the law rather than that the law is ****ed up.

Who would want to live somewhere where wandering into a protest with a loaded gun is seen as normal rather than confrontational.

[Wash DC Blue]

Re: Kyle Rittenhouse

What’s mad is people think it’s fine that he shot these because it’s the law rather than that the law is ****ed up.

Who would want to live somewhere where wandering into a protest with a loaded gun is seen as normal rather than confrontational.

It's very multifaceted.

He was portrayed to be a monster and guilty as **** by one set of media.
A Hero that deserves cannonization by another.

In the meantime people make their minds up really by Echo chamber (My Brother In Law is still livid about the verdict).

The Morality, again....Polarized.

The Third guy he shot also had a gun even though it wasn't an AR, pointed at him.

[Kitman]

Re: Kyle Rittenhouse

We could argue this all night, I know he was found guilty by an elected jury and some bizarre loop holes in Gun laws which were clearly written for hunting but allows any kid to run around and shoot an assault rifle which makes it hard to argue against.

The most f**ked up thing about this whole incident is that this little prick being brainwashed by the right wing media to thinking that he needed to go and play militia in an area of unrest - and now he is seen in the eyes of the law as satisfactory

You cannot argue this sets a terrifying precedent. That anyone can turn up to an incendiary protest anywhere in America fully armed, with a privileged notion of “order” then play judge jury and executioner without facing any consequences.

[jeepster]

Re: Kyle Rittenhouse

After all three attacked him. Come back when you know what's going on mate

and you seem so clued up, mate not

[Croesy Blue]

Re: Kyle Rittenhouse

We could argue this all night, I know he was found guilty by an elected jury and some bizarre loop holes in Gun laws which were clearly written for hunting but allows any kid to run around and shoot an assault rifle which makes it hard to argue against.

The most f**ked up thing about this whole incident is that this little prick being brainwashed by the right wing media to thinking that he needed to go and play militia in an area of unrest - and now he is seen in the eyes of the law as satisfactory

You cannot argue this sets a terrifying precedent. That anyone can turn up to an incendiary protest anywhere in America fully armed, with a privileged notion of “order” then play judge jury and executioner without facing any consequences.

agreed I can’t believe people don’t think this sets a dangerous precedent. Carry and gun and provoke someone into attacking you. Free kill.

[Croesy Blue]

Re: Kyle Rittenhouse

It's very multifaceted.

He was portrayed to be a monster and guilty as **** by one set of media.
A Hero that deserves cannonization by another.

In the meantime people make their minds up really by Echo chamber (My Brother In Law is still livid about the verdict).

The Morality, again....Polarized.

The Third guy he shot also had a gun even though it wasn't an AR, pointed at him.

Beyond all that though the situation and the law is ****ed. Any other country on Earth walking into a protest with a rifle on your back would be seen as the lunacy and provocation it is.

But not only is the law in the US a dystopian nightmare but politicians then use a little psychopath as a point scorer and people are stupid and biased enough to lap it up.

The 3rd guy pointed a gun at him because he’d ****ing shot someone ffs, how can he be a monster and deserve to be killed while the other kid gets off completely. ****ed up country, ****ed up gun laws and ****ed up politicians being idolised by idiots.

[Llandaff Blue]

Re: Kyle Rittenhouse

and you seem so clued up, mate not

you've had too much to drink

[splott parker]

Re: Kyle Rittenhouse

In a country where you are allowed to carry guns? Yeah alright

Even more heroic, I’d be running the other way

[Wash DC Blue]

Re: Kyle Rittenhouse

Beyond all that though the situation and the law is ****ed. Any other country on Earth walking into a protest with a rifle on your back would be seen as the lunacy and provocation it is.

But not only is the law in the US a dystopian nightmare but politicians then use a little psychopath as a point scorer and people are stupid and biased enough to lap it up.

Of course it is.
As is going in as a protester with a gun.

Joe Biden called Rittenhouse a White Supremacist apparently.

[Croesy Blue]

Re: Kyle Rittenhouse

Of course it is.
As is going in as a protester with a gun.

Joe Biden called Rittenhouse a White Supremacist apparently.

There are photos of him with the proud boys doing that daft white power sign.

But Biden would have been better off keeping quiet just stirs up the lunatic fringe on the other side hero worshiping a 16 year old psychopath. Just completely depressing I can’t imagine being the sort of **** to hero worship someone like that.

[Wash DC Blue]

Re: Kyle Rittenhouse

There are photos of him with the proud boys.

But Biden would have been better off keeping quiet.

Are they a White Supremacist group?

Honest question as I do not know anything about them apart from they opposed Antfa.

[Kitman]

Re: Kyle Rittenhouse

Joe Biden called Rittenhouse a White Supremacist apparently.

If he did that then that was stupid, talk about stirring the pot.

[Wash DC Blue]

Re: Kyle Rittenhouse

If he did that then that was stupid, talk about stirring the pot.

It's a mess Mate.
Most politicians are clowns.

[jimmyscoular]

Re: Kyle Rittenhouse

Didn't he cross state lines with a gun, how old was he again?

Sigh. No, he didn't.