Does The Side Look Better Without Kieffer Moore

[life on mars]

Just feel we seem to be looking for different options without him , we move with quicker pace up front .

Hugill's game seem to have a lot more about it , seeks out different angled runs ,plays of the shoulder very well stays upright, he is little like a bulked up tougher Chopra ?

[dembethewarrior]

Re: Does The Side Look Better Without Kieffer Moore

Yes

[Rock_Flock_of_Five]

Re: Does The Side Look Better Without Kieffer Moore

Yes.

Both players base their game around physicality, no secret about that. However, Hughill is more of an intelligent player. If a referee's decision goes against Hugill... okay, no big deal, quickly move on to the next play. Moore on the other hand, seemed to be locked in a mental battle (as well as a physical one, of course!) with both his opponent AND the referee! He'd lose focus of what his primary objective was.
For a big guy, who undoubtedly had strength, he didn't half go to ground easily.

[IanD]

Re: Does The Side Look Better Without Kieffer Moore

Yes.

Both players base their game around physicality, no secret about that. However, Hughill is more of an intelligent player. If a referee's decision goes against Hugill... okay, no big deal, quickly move on to the next play. Moore on the other hand, seemed to be locked in a mental battle (as well as a physical one, of course!) with both his opponent AND the referee! He'd lose focus of what his primary objective was.
For a big guy, who undoubtedly had strength, he didn't half go to ground easily.

....and for too many matches he was the sole target outlet for Smithies. At least we can vary the play more, now.

[DubaiDai]

Re: Does The Side Look Better Without Kieffer Moore

....and for too many matches he was the sole target outlet for Smithies. At least we can vary the play more, now.

we haven't played with any wingers for some time and never played to Moore's strengths since the departure of Warnock.
I prefer Morisons strategy of trying to play football and not simply launch crosses.

[North Cardiff Blue]

Re: Does The Side Look Better Without Kieffer Moore

Just feel we seem to be looking for different options without him , we move with quicker pace up front .

Hugill's game seem to have a lot more about it , seeks out different angled runs ,plays of the shoulder very well stays upright, he is little like a bulked up tougher Chopra ?

That's a good observation and spot on we look a far better team without him, Hugill has been a revelation he fits this team like a glove, as have the other loans it's been very good transfer window.

[Eric the Half a Bee]

Re: Does The Side Look Better Without Kieffer Moore

Just feel we seem to be looking for different options without him , we move with quicker pace up front .

Hugill's game seem to have a lot more about it , seeks out different angled runs ,plays of the shoulder very well stays upright, he is little like a bulked up tougher Chopra ?

On the flip side, would a fully motivated and on form Kieffer Moore be better for the way we now play football?

[dembethewarrior]

Re: Does The Side Look Better Without Kieffer Moore

On the flip side, would a fully motivated and on form Kieffer Moore be better for the way we now play football?

It's been done and done hasn't it? Can't we just keep this thread on track and answer the single question being asked?

[Eric the Half a Bee]

Re: Does The Side Look Better Without Kieffer Moore

It's been done and done hasn't it? Can't we just keep this thread on track and answer the single question being asked?

Apologies Herr Dembe for not seeing the exact question somewhere else. I don't read every thread. In any case, surely that's what happens in threads - question, someone else has another question directly related to the question, brings about debate etc, unless we're not allowed to reply with questions any more by the message board police...

[tforturton]

Re: Does The Side Look Better Without Kieffer Moore

To answer the original question - In a word, yes. And to answer the other one - maybe, but I think the side is moving away from his sort of game. Hence the recent lack of goals - we weren't playing his sort of football any more.

[dembethewarrior]

Re: Does The Side Look Better Without Kieffer Moore

Apologies Herr Dembe for not seeing the exact question somewhere else. I don't read every thread. In any case, surely that's what happens in threads - question, someone else has another question directly related to the question, brings about debate etc, unless we're not allowed to reply with questions any more by the message board police...

The discussion on Moore has happened time and time again, you don't have to really read every thread to pick up on that I certainly don't and I've seen it discussed enough.

You can, of course, post what you want where you want, without cockyness as well

Sarcastic jibes aren't your thing.

[dembethewarrior]

Re: Does The Side Look Better Without Kieffer Moore

To answer the original question - In a word, yes. And to answer the other one - maybe, but I think the side is moving away from his sort of game. Hence the recent lack of goals - we weren't playing his sort of football any more.

He's ****ed at Bournemouth then.

[the other bob wilson]

Re: Does The Side Look Better Without Kieffer Moore

On the flip side, would a fully motivated and on form Kieffer Moore be better for the way we now play football?

Just what I was thinking, but, fair play to Hugill, he’s done well since he’s been here and we could do a it worse than try to get him back for next season.

[Sloop_Jon_Bee]

Re: Does The Side Look Better Without Kieffer Moore

Just what I was thinking, but, fair play to Hugill, he’s done well since he’s been here and we could do a it worse than try to get him back for next season.

[Citizen's Nephew]

Re: Does The Side Look Better Without Kieffer Moore

Just what I was thinking, but, fair play to Hugill, he’s done well since he’s been here and we could do a it worse than try to get him back for next season.

I'm really shocked at how much I've taken to Hugill. I think we're a better side without Moore. I think LOM makes some good points about the way he plays and his style. He doesn't chase lost causes like Moore used to. He really does put defenders and GKs under pressure and makes them nervous/forces errors.