Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Bye bye Sam!
Collapse
X
-
Re: Bye bye Sam!
Elsewhere someone is saying Tan wasn't confident so settled out of court. If so why didn't that grabbing leach take Tan all the way?Originally posted by TWGL1 View PostIf Hammam’s £15m court case was that strong he wouldn’t have settled out of court , you could also argue ?
Comment
-
Re: Bye bye Sam!
Originally posted by bobh View PostDoes the settlement end Sam's ownership of stadium naming rights?
Can't see it mentioned anywhere.If it was settled, how come we don't have a stadium sponsor ?Originally posted by Rjk View PostI thought that was settled previously
I'm happy with "CCS" btw - but shirley a sponsor would bring some money into the club?
I thought we stuck with CCS so that Sam couldn't siphon off anymore money - because he held the rights?
Comment
-
Re: Bye bye Sam!
I would say that he probably came to a settlement in order to keep his business dealings out of court. I won't be surprised if the Michael Isaac case ends up being settled in a similar fashion.Originally posted by stan butler View PostElsewhere someone is saying Tan wasn't confident so settled out of court. If so why didn't that grabbing leach take Tan all the way?
Comment
-
Re: Bye bye Sam!
Yes, it is an interesting argument that both men would have had to agree to settle, but only one of them was unconfident about winning.Originally posted by stan butler View PostElsewhere someone is saying Tan wasn't confident so settled out of court. If so why didn't that grabbing leach take Tan all the way?
Comment
Quick Navigation
Collapse

Comment