Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Fury v Whyte

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Re: Fury v Whyte

    Originally posted by delmbox View Post
    to be fair some of your views make him look like mother teresa
    Mother Teresa wasn't all that nice.

    Comment


    • #17
      Re: Fury v Whyte

      I would much rather watch marvyn hagler v hitman hearns

      I think that's proper boxing

      Incredible athletes going hammer at each other

      Fury can box but he's no athlete , he's got a beer gut and love handles ff sake

      Can't his fitness staff get that off him , it's embarrassing

      Comment


      • #18
        Re: Fury v Whyte

        Originally posted by SLUDGE FACTORY View Post
        I would much rather watch marvyn hagler v hitman hearns

        I think that's proper boxing

        Incredible athletes going hammer at each other

        Fury can box but he's no athlete , he's got a beer gut and love handles ff sake

        Can't his fitness staff get that off him , it's embarrassing
        He's like an egg on legs.
        I don't think he's that good just below shit opposition.

        Comment


        • #19
          Re: Fury v Whyte

          Originally posted by stan butler View Post
          He's like an egg on legs.
          I don't think he's that good just below shit opposition.
          Think that’s a bit unfair

          Comment


          • #20
            Re: Fury v Whyte

            Originally posted by WJ99mobile View Post
            Think that’s a bit unfair
            Very unfair.

            Comment


            • #21
              Re: Fury v Whyte

              Originally posted by stan butler View Post
              He's like an egg on legs.
              I don't think he's that good just below shit opposition.
              My opinion is that if his level of fitness.....ie beer gut ......means he's top level heavyweight it doesn't say a lot for the division ?

              Comment


              • #22
                Re: Fury v Whyte

                Originally posted by SLUDGE FACTORY View Post
                I would much rather watch marvyn hagler v hitman hearns

                I think that's proper boxing

                Incredible athletes going hammer at each other

                Fury can box but he's no athlete , he's got a beer gut and love handles ff sake

                Can't his fitness staff get that off him , it's embarrassing
                Man on sofa says the f**king undefeated heavyweight boxing champion of the world isn't an athlete and says his body's embarrassing ffs. Peak internet :facepalm:

                Comment


                • #23
                  Re: Fury v Whyte

                  Originally posted by SLUDGE FACTORY View Post
                  My opinion is that if his level of fitness.....ie beer gut ......means he's top level heavyweight it doesn't say a lot for the division ?
                  Yes hes undefeated but look at his opponents absolute dross.
                  A top level heavyweight shouldnt have his belly and love handles wobbling

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Re: Fury v Whyte

                    Originally posted by stan butler View Post
                    He's like an egg on legs.
                    I don't think he's that good just below shit opposition.
                    That's bollocks Stan. He moves like a middleweight, has a granite jaw and incredible recovery levels, can fight Southpaw and orthodox, switch hitter. Can now fight different styles due to Sugar Hill Steward, his trainer. The man is an incredible boxer.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Re: Fury v Whyte

                      Originally posted by delmbox View Post
                      Man on sofa says the f**king undefeated heavyweight boxing champion of the world isn't an athlete and says his body's embarrassing ffs. Peak internet :facepalm:
                      Great, innit. Sludge obviously doesn't understand conditioning.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Re: Fury v Whyte

                        Originally posted by delmbox View Post
                        Man on sofa says the f**king undefeated heavyweight boxing champion of the world isn't an athlete and says his body's embarrassing ffs. Peak internet :facepalm:
                        Well he clearly isn't is he ?

                        Tomlin was a highly gifted footballer but he was no athlete was he ?

                        And fury is out of condition yet he's champion on the world ?

                        That's says it all about heavyweight boxing

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Re: Fury v Whyte

                          Originally posted by stan butler View Post
                          Yes hes undefeated but look at his opponents absolute dross.
                          A top level heavyweight shouldnt have his belly and love handles wobbling
                          It was laughable really , if bodybuilders years older than him can cut and shred then why can't he ?

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Re: Fury v Whyte

                            Originally posted by Tuerto View Post
                            Great, innit. Sludge obviously doesn't understand conditioning.
                            I know a fat bloke when I see one

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Re: Fury v Whyte

                              Originally posted by SLUDGE FACTORY View Post
                              It was laughable really , if bodybuilders years older than him can cut and shred then why can't he ?
                              Some people can't. Fury has never been cut, even in his younger days, plenty of heavyweight boxers aren't. He also went up to 30 stone, so his skin has stretched. Fury wouldn't be the same fighter if he carried about loads of muscle, he'd gas easily and become robotic. He's incredibly fit for the discipline that he takes part in.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Re: Fury v Whyte

                                Originally posted by SLUDGE FACTORY View Post
                                Well he clearly isn't is he ?

                                Tomlin was a highly gifted footballer but he was no athlete was he ?

                                And fury is out of condition yet he's champion on the world ?

                                That's says it all about heavyweight boxing
                                of course he's an athlete, do you have any concept how much cardio work you have to do to be a boxer? or how exhausting it is constantly moving whilst punching and being punched by an 18 stone man?

                                for someone who's sport is chucking a bit of string with a hook on it into water you're talking a big game

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X