Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Fury v Whyte

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #61
    Re: Fury v Whyte

    Originally posted by chrisp_1927 View Post
    Personally I don't see the problem with carrying a bit of weight. If you can do the strength work and the fitness work required, what's wrong with a bit of fat around it. What practical use is there for being 'chiseled' over just being fit and strong.


    The idea of calling a boxer unfit disappeared for me the first time I had a go on a punchbag . 30 seconds and I'm blowing. 12 rounds of punching would be tiring enough, that's without factoring in some bloke punching you in the head constantly
    He's not unfit but he's overweight

    It's not a good advert at all in my opinion

    Comment


    • #62
      Re: Fury v Whyte

      Originally posted by stan butler View Post
      He's like an egg on legs.
      I don't think he's that good just below shit opposition.

      It's a strange one, people usually say athletes/boxers/footballers keep evolving and are better than the athletes/boxers/footballers of the past, I would agree.

      Then along comes someone who breaks the mould, like a fat fighter, and it's because he's fat the opposition are shit?

      It can't be right can it the opposition are better than Ali's opposition aren't they?

      Same with the Premier League, last year Man City waked it, it's because the other teams are shit?

      Would the current Liverpool team beat 1983/84 team? - They'd murder them surely ?

      Comment


      • #63
        Re: Fury v Whyte

        Originally posted by SLUDGE FACTORY View Post
        Is a fat bloke leaning on someone part of the sport of boxing ?

        Jesus it's pretty low
        You are so negative on so many different levels it unbelievable. No point in having the conversation.

        Comment


        • #64
          Re: Fury v Whyte

          Originally posted by North Cardiff Blue View Post
          It's a strange one, people usually say athletes/boxers/footballers keep evolving and are better than the athletes/boxers/footballers of the past, I would agree.

          Then along comes someone who breaks the mould, like a fat fighter, and it's because he's fat the opposition are shit?

          It can't be right can it the opposition are better than Ali's opposition aren't they?

          Same with the Premier League, last year Man City waked it, it's because the other teams are shit?

          Would the current Liverpool team beat 1983/84 team? - They'd murder them surely ?
          His opponents have been rubbish.
          Not Fury's fault but the opponents he's had have been crap in general and not just against him.

          Comment


          • #65
            Re: Fury v Whyte

            Originally posted by Tuerto View Post
            Fury's weight works for him, he leans on his opponents and gases them. I'm surprised people are having a go at a fatty on here, let's face it, it must give the majority of us some hope!
            Maybe he should indeed consider changing his diet.

            Comment

            Working...
            X