Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Callum Paterson

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #16
    Re: Callum Paterson

    Paterson is a below-average Championship player. Sheffield Wednesday is a below-average Championship team. Who ****ing cares if he's their player of the month?

    Comment


    • #17
      Re: Callum Paterson

      Originally posted by NYCBlue View Post
      Paterson is a below-average Championship player. Sheffield Wednesday is a below-average Championship team. Who ****ing cares if he's their player of the month?
      Summed up perfectly!

      Comment


      • #18
        Re: Callum Paterson

        Originally posted by NYCBlue View Post
        Paterson is a below-average Championship player. Sheffield Wednesday is a below-average Championship team. Who ****ing cares if he's their player of the month?
        I am in this school.

        Very below average hard working football player .

        Why are people fixated when an ex player scores a goal or two . We dont send all our ex players to the scrap
        heap. there is a game or two left in some of them .

        Comment


        • #19
          Re: Callum Paterson

          Originally posted by blue matt View Post
          I liked Patto, great character and could play in a number of positions, it was all good

          BUT

          if we were serious about being a side challenging for promotion, he was not the answer to any of the questions
          He played up front in a team that almost stayed in the Premier League, he deserves more credit.

          Comment


          • #20
            Re: Callum Paterson

            Originally posted by NYCBlue View Post
            Paterson is a below-average Championship player. Sheffield Wednesday is a below-average Championship team. Who ****ing cares if he's their player of the month?
            Id say hes an average Championship player.

            Weve just signed a player arguably an average L1 player.

            Comment


            • #21
              Re: Callum Paterson

              Originally posted by J R Hartley View Post
              Btec Kiefer
              No doubt but not sure we should have let him go

              Comment


              • #22
                Re: Callum Paterson

                Originally posted by Jimmy the Jock View Post
                I am in this school.

                Very below average hard working football player .

                Why are people fixated when an ex player scores a goal or two . We dont send all our ex players to the scrap
                heap. there is a game or two left in some of them .
                He would have done a better job up front than Glatzel

                He would have done a better job than Bacuna at full back

                He would have done a better job at DM than Ralls

                He would have done a better job at centre back than Flint

                And he probably would have done a better job on the wing than Hoilett

                He knows his limitations and makes the absolute most of his strengths.

                And he’s got a pair of bollocks. Hard to come by in this team at the moment.

                Comment


                • #23
                  Re: Callum Paterson

                  Originally posted by WJ99mobile View Post
                  He would have done a better job up front than Glatzel

                  He would have done a better job than Bacuna at full back

                  He would have done a better job at DM than Ralls

                  He would have done a better job at centre back than Flint

                  And he probably would have done a better job on the wing than Hoilett

                  He knows his limitations and makes the absolute most of his strengths.

                  And he’s got a pair of bollocks. Hard to come by in this team at the moment.
                  Your entitled to your opinion.

                  Disagree with most of that.

                  Comment


                  • #24
                    Re: Callum Paterson

                    All depends what kind of wage he was on. Rightly or Wrongly Harris hardly used him so at the time it made sense to get him off the wage bill.

                    Comment


                    • #25
                      Re: Callum Paterson

                      Originally posted by WJ99mobile View Post
                      He would have done a better job up front than Glatzel

                      He would have done a better job than Bacuna at full back

                      He would have done a better job at DM than Ralls

                      He would have done a better job at centre back than Flint

                      And he probably would have done a better job on the wing than Hoilett

                      He knows his limitations and makes the absolute most of his strengths.

                      And he’s got a pair of bollocks. Hard to come by in this team at the moment.
                      Ahead of Glatzel maybe.

                      The rest who knows but if have little confidence of him playing in a lot of those positions ahead of who we had.

                      Comment


                      • #26
                        Re: Callum Paterson

                        Originally posted by SLUDGE FACTORY View Post
                        he would be more than useful now

                        Its not the time to play our way out of the bottom ten , get stuck in , get some wins and get up the table

                        Pretty pretty keep ball has its place but let's get to 50 points first

                        Could have done a job for us in midfield , centre back , right back too

                        Bad move in letting him go
                        like he would have been put in any of those positions

                        Comment


                        • #27
                          Re: Callum Paterson

                          Originally posted by Hilts View Post
                          Your entitled to your opinion.

                          Disagree with most of that.
                          Fair enough.

                          I liked Callum as a player even though he was technically shit.

                          Comment


                          • #28
                            Re: Callum Paterson

                            Originally posted by WJ99mobile View Post
                            He would have done a better job up front than Glatzel

                            He would have done a better job than Bacuna at full back

                            He would have done a better job at DM than Ralls

                            He would have done a better job at centre back than Flint

                            And he probably would have done a better job on the wing than Hoilett

                            He knows his limitations and makes the absolute most of his strengths.

                            And he’s got a pair of bollocks. Hard to come by in this team at the moment.
                            If he was such a brilliant player how come only cash strapped Sheffield Wednesday were interested? If he was Championship standard in every single position surely there would be a huge clamour for his signature?

                            As someone who's had to endure Paterson on the wing, no he's not a better winger than Hoilett, it was embarrassing. Paterson has also shown none of the required attributes to be a good centre back or central midfielder. He was effective up front as a novelty act, but he was soon figured out by other defences (in fact he was best utilised behind the striker)

                            Comment


                            • #29
                              Re: Callum Paterson

                              Originally posted by City123 View Post
                              If he was such a brilliant player how come only cash strapped Sheffield Wednesday were interested? If he was Championship standard in every single position surely there would be a huge clamour for his signature?

                              As someone who's had to endure Paterson on the wing, no he's not a better winger than Hoilett, it was embarrassing. Paterson has also shown none of the required attributes to be a good centre back or central midfielder. He was effective up front as a novelty act, but he was soon figured out by other defences (in fact he was best utilised behind the striker)
                              Slightly on the cruel side unfortunately its the truth.

                              Comment


                              • #30
                                Re: Callum Paterson

                                Originally posted by City123 View Post
                                If he was such a brilliant player how come only cash strapped Sheffield Wednesday were interested? If he was Championship standard in every single position surely there would be a huge clamour for his signature?

                                As someone who's had to endure Paterson on the wing, no he's not a better winger than Hoilett, it was embarrassing. Paterson has also shown none of the required attributes to be a good centre back or central midfielder. He was effective up front as a novelty act, but he was soon figured out by other defences (in fact he was best utilised behind the striker)
                                Loads of people on here seem to completely misremember how Paterson actually played for us. It's quite odd.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X