Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Neil Warnock
Collapse
X
-
-
Re: Neil Warnock
Reid didn’t cost us money though. He was never a Warnock player though, a really odd signing in hindsight. Good player mind, him and Camarasa always linked up wellOriginally posted by NYCBlue View PostBobby Reid. What a bargain. Warnock got nothing out of him. Now starts for a top 10 EPL club.
Comment
-
Re: Neil Warnock
The reckon the club has no intention of having him and Sol back. I don't want them back either..
He's trying his !uck with pompey with his false i l love the club ,the fans and so on :facepalm: if he gets the job the bullshitters on here and elsewhere will be making crap up like we couldnt compete or he wanted to come but the club turned them down :xmashehe:
Comment
-
Re: Neil Warnock
We were lucky enough to sell him on. We still paid him though. I'm pretty sure Warnock said of him after he left "I wanted to build a team around". What a blatant lie.Originally posted by Pedro de la Rosa View PostReid didn’t cost us money though. He was never a Warnock player though, a really odd signing in hindsight. Good player mind, him and Camarasa always linked up well
Comment
-
Re: Neil Warnock
Bobby Reid and Camarasa, they both had good movement about them and liked playing the ball on the deck - not your typical Warnock kind of players.Originally posted by Pedro de la Rosa View PostReid didn’t cost us money though. He was never a Warnock player though, a really odd signing in hindsight. Good player mind, him and Camarasa always linked up well
I felt that Camarasa always seemed to struggle with the abrasiveness of the British game, never seeming to see out the end of a match.
Comment
-
Re: Neil Warnock
Camarasa plaued 90 minutes in nearly every game! He scored my favourite goal of that season in the 94th min. Loved him, someone that could actually play, along with Decordova-Reid.Originally posted by Rock_Flock_of_Five View PostBobby Reid and Camarasa, they both had good movement about them and liked playing the ball on the deck - not your typical Warnock kind of players.
I felt that Camarasa always seemed to struggle with the abrasiveness of the British game, never seeming to see out the end of a match.
Comment
-
Re: Neil Warnock
Originally posted by NYCBlue View PostWe were lucky enough to sell him on. We still paid him though. I'm pretty sure Warnock said of him after he left "I wanted to build a team around". What a blatant lie.
We should have. That team at Old Trafford should have been our side going forwards.
Hoilett, Decordova-Reid, Murphy behind Zohore. Ralls and Bacuna. That would have been OK. Instead we flogged Decordova-Reid, WBA paid silly money for Zohore and we signed a load of shite. We'd have been challenging if we kept them and signed a good right back.
Comment
-
Re: Neil Warnock
I think it was pretty much the only game we played zohore, Decordova reid and Murphy together wasnt it?Originally posted by Pedro de la Rosa View PostWe should have. That team at Old Trafford should have been our side going forwards.
Hoilett, Decordova-Reid, Murphy behind Zohore. Ralls and Bacuna. That would have been OK. Instead we flogged Decordova-Reid, WBA paid silly money for Zohore and we signed a load of shite. We'd have been challenging if we kept them and signed a good right back.
Comment
-
Re: Neil Warnock
Fairly obvious wasn't it, I thought he would have started straight after Leeds, but it was only a week later that Hudson went.Originally posted by North Cardiff Blue View Posthttps://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/fo...rk-Hudson.html
It seems the most obvious choice, ideally we would go for the very best we could get long term, but would they come in our current position?
Warnock to the end of the season makes sense, Tan can't afford for us to go down, so I think they will try and persuade him, and knowing Warnock and us being his kind of people, he'll take one MORE last job.
Comment
Quick Navigation
Collapse

Comment