Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Warnock not being considered

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Re: Warnock not being considered

    Originally posted by The Lone Gunman View Post
    It suggest to me that Vincent Tan won't re-employ a man he's discovered has tucked him in the past.

    "Neil Warnock did a good job taking us up, but then he creates a bad side and buys the wrong players. Murphy cost £11m, hardly scored any goals, then left on a free transfer. He was never worth that money. I was conned." (Vincent Tan, November 2022)
    Good old Vinnie showing his knowledge.

    Murphy scored 16 goals in 132 games prior to coming to City. A goal every 8.25 games
    When he was here he scored 10 in 88 games. Slightly less in the goals to games ratio but hardly a world away.

    Tan bemoans a player virtually continuing the scoring record he had prior to coming here.

    Comment


    • #32
      Re: Warnock not being considered

      Originally posted by blue lewj View Post
      Good old Vinnie showing his knowledge.

      Murphy scored 16 goals in 132 games prior to coming to City. A goal every 8.25 games
      When he was here he scored 10 in 88 games. Slightly less in the goals to games ratio but hardly a world away.

      Tan bemoans a player virtually continuing the scoring record he had prior to coming here.
      Which is exactly the point...
      Who the f*ck wants to pay £11mil for one player in this league, to continue with the same scoring record?

      Comment


      • #33
        Re: Warnock not being considered

        Originally posted by Ninja View Post
        Which is exactly the point...
        Who the f*ck wants to pay £11mil for one player in this league, to continue with the same scoring record?
        What suggested to anybody after being at Norwich he would score any more here given the style we played?
        Just because we paid a daft fee for him he is suddenly going to go up a few levels?

        I certainly wouldn't have thought so and he didn't.

        The owner cries foul for any signing that does not come good. Sadly that is football.

        Comment


        • #34
          Re: Warnock not being considered

          Originally posted by SLUDGE FACTORY View Post
          Potter is warnock in a wheelchair

          Let's have it
          we are more likely to get Brian from the magic roudabout

          Comment


          • #35
            Re: Warnock not being considered

            Originally posted by Ninja View Post
            Which is exactly the point...
            Who the f*ck wants to pay £11mil for one player in this league, to continue with the same scoring record?
            Here's a novel idea, and it seems to have escaped Vinnie and the board.

            If you want a decent return on goals from a player then maybe, and I know this is totally crazy, but target a player who has scored goals up to that point. Might be an idea.

            Same goes for a manager now I come to think about it.
            Let's stop targeting randoms in our quest for uncovering the next Fergie and pick actual competent managers. Groundbreaking I know.

            Comment


            • #36
              Re: Warnock not being considered

              Originally posted by Rock_Flock_of_Five View Post
              It would indeed be a remarkable about-turn, if Tan was to cast aside those remarks and reappoint Warnock.

              Of course, stranger things have happened in football, but I feel Tan wouldn't let Warnock's past dealings concerning the club's transfers just slide.
              Quite. I strongly suspect some of the more 'interesting' aspects of Warnock's transfer dealings might have come out of the woodwork in the last couple of years during the club's internal investigations into the Sala case. Indeed, I'm somewhat surprised Tan hasn't threatened any litigation yet, although I'd guess the Chuckle Brothers signed off all of the deals, so that's probably out of the question.

              Comment


              • #37
                Re: Warnock not being considered

                Originally posted by blue lewj View Post
                Here's a novel idea, and it seems to have escaped Vinnie and the board.

                If you want a decent return on goals from a player then maybe, and I know this is totally crazy, but target a player who has scored goals up to that point. Might be an idea.

                Same goes for a manager now I come to think about it.
                Let's stop targeting randoms in our quest for uncovering the next Fergie and pick actual competent managers. Groundbreaking I know.
                You are fecking crazy, coming out with all this crap about the board using common sense in its decision making. This is Cardiff City with a crackpot owner and board, not some well run club with oodles of footballing knowledge on the top table.

                Comment


                • #38
                  Re: Warnock not being considered

                  Originally posted by Eric the Half a Bee View Post
                  You are fecking crazy, coming out with all this crap about the board using common sense in its decision making. This is Cardiff City with a crackpot owner and board, not some well run club with oodles of footballing knowledge on the top table.
                  If the person pulling the strings can't see that to get goals you buy a goalscorer and not a one goal in eight winger then we truly are f*****.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Re: Warnock not being considered

                    Originally posted by blue lewj View Post
                    If the person pulling the strings can't see that to get goals you buy a goalscorer and not a one goal in eight winger then we truly are f*****.
                    Several years ago I remember Tan talking about Michu after Swansea bought him. Tan said that Michu was proof that you didn't need to spend lots to get a top goalscorer. In a way he has a point - if you've got excellent scouts and contacts at a club you might unearth a gem for not a lot of money. You might get lucky.

                    Of course we haven't got anything like that at Cardiff City - quite the reverse! I'm not sure what the opposite of midas touch is but it applies to our transfer activity over the last decade.

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Re: Warnock not being considered

                      Originally posted by Eric the Half a Bee View Post
                      Several years ago I remember Tan talking about Michu after Swansea bought him. Tan said that Michu was proof that you didn't need to spend lots to get a top goalscorer. In a way he has a point - if you've got excellent scouts and contacts at a club you might unearth a gem for not a lot of money. You might get lucky.

                      Of course we haven't got anything like that at Cardiff City - quite the reverse! I'm not sure what the opposite of midas touch is but it applies to our transfer activity over the last decade.
                      Everything they touch turns to s***. :hehe:

                      If you don't laugh you'll cry.

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Re: Warnock not being considered

                        Originally posted by blue lewj View Post
                        If the person pulling the strings can't see that to get goals you buy a goalscorer and not a one goal in eight winger then we truly are f*****.
                        We signed Bobby Reid at the same time to score goals but Warnock didnt make him a regular. We even had one game I think v Fulham where we needed a goal and left Reid on the bench and brought on Rhys Healey. To grab a goal no Healey was put on long throw duties.

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Re: Warnock not being considered

                          Originally posted by Eric the Half a Bee View Post
                          Several years ago I remember Tan talking about Michu after Swansea bought him. Tan said that Michu was proof that you didn't need to spend lots to get a top goalscorer. In a way he has a point - if you've got excellent scouts and contacts at a club you might unearth a gem for not a lot of money. You might get lucky.

                          Of course we haven't got anything like that at Cardiff City - quite the reverse! I'm not sure what the opposite of midas touch is but it applies to our transfer activity over the last decade.

                          The Sadim Touch

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Re: Warnock not being considered

                            Originally posted by The Lone Gunman View Post
                            It suggest to me that Vincent Tan won't re-employ a man he's discovered has tucked him in the past.

                            "Neil Warnock did a good job taking us up, but then he creates a bad side and buys the wrong players. Murphy cost £11m, hardly scored any goals, then left on a free transfer. He was never worth that money. I was conned." (Vincent Tan, November 2022)
                            Tbf ..Tan seems very fallible to being conned. Mackay rinsed him like a banger in Ibiza

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Re: Warnock not being considered

                              Originally posted by blue lewj View Post
                              Here's a novel idea, and it seems to have escaped Vinnie and the board.

                              If you want a decent return on goals from a player then maybe, and I know this is totally crazy, but target a player who has scored goals up to that point. Might be an idea.

                              Same goes for a manager now I come to think about it.
                              Let's stop targeting randoms in our quest for uncovering the next Fergie and pick actual competent managers. Groundbreaking I know.
                              Like Eoin Doyle and Ronnie Moore ? Cracking idea.

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Re: Warnock not being considered

                                Originally posted by Hilts View Post
                                We signed Bobby Reid at the same time to score goals but Warnock didnt make him a regular. We even had one game I think v Fulham where we needed a goal and left Reid on the bench and brought on Rhys Healey. To grab a goal no Healey was put on long throw duties.
                                Not sure why.

                                His record was almost as bad as Murphy's.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X