HmmmmmQuote:
Originally Posted by Tito Fuente
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/202...t-home-school/
Printable View
HmmmmmQuote:
Originally Posted by Tito Fuente
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/202...t-home-school/
HmmmmmQuote:
Originally Posted by Tito Fuente
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/202...t-home-school/
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/lockdown-files/
What are your views/opinions on these links, T?Quote:
Originally Posted by TWGL1
And yet they put thousands in care homes untested... hmmmm
Midazolam, Bobsy. I've mentioned it several times re achieving excess mortalities. The last time was a month ago: https://www.ccmb.co.uk/showthread.ph...=1#post5389357Quote:
Originally Posted by the other bob wilson
The big grand total number was manufactured by way of an easily manipulated fake test and dying within 28 days of providing one. It was a PCR test pandemic.
Lying about fake Covid deaths is a new low point.
I wonder if this post will be allowed to remain on the board.
It's been reported.
I’m not sure if this article is of any useQuote:
Originally Posted by Tito Fuente
Ps what was your other user name ?
https://12ft.io/proxy?q=https%3A%2F%...irus-admits%2F
Feel free to point me to the part of that article which states "The big grand total number was manufactured by way of an easily manipulated fake test and dying within 28 days of providing one. It was a PCR test pandemic." and it may then be of great use.Quote:
Originally Posted by TWGL1
How would you feel if you had lost a loved one to Covid-19 and then read on here that it was actually "manufactured" because of an "easily manipulated fake test".
I know that you lack empathy because it doesn't affect you personally - but at least try to see that it may be upsetting for people to read blatant lies about how or why their loved one died.
Thankfully, I'm not one of those people but I can still see how crass and distasteful it is to post this nonsense.
My other username was FeverEspaña on cardiffcityforum.
What was your other username? I seem to remember you getting a bit shirty with other posters whenever they have asked you this question.
Well I can understand your view if you have felt a personal loss.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tito Fuente
Regards
I said that I hadn't suffered a personal loss but I am capable of empathy.Quote:
Originally Posted by TWGL1
What was your username?
It was about ten years ago , I can remember tbhQuote:
Originally Posted by Tito Fuente
Reported twice and still no response from the moderators.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tito Fuente
I don't think this opinion is so unique and abhorrent to require such a reaction. Were there not many different claims when numbers were being announced that people who died within 28 days of a positive test actually died of something else.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tito Fuente
There were reports that people were killed in car crashes but because 20 - 28 days earlier they had tested positive does not mean they died from Covid.
I lost a close family friend during the early days of the pandemic, so I'm not being glib.
Or am I missing something?
The part where he said the tests were manipulated *and* fake, I'm guessing.Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Morris
Also calling it a "fake PCR pandemic".
A lot of Organ Morgan's stuff comes close to what a lot of people would find reprehensible but he gets a let off because it's just another day, another riff on a conspiracy.
Saying covid deaths were manipulated and faked is surely not acceptable (even in the context of what you said above)?
Didn't the inventor of the PCR tests say they weren't suitable for diagnosing viral infections, or something to that effect? They were also playing around with the PCR amplification levels which led to more false positive results.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tito Fuente
<blockquote class="twitter-tweet"><p lang="en" dir="ltr">We will never know exactly how many people were admitted to hospital with Covid because they fiddled the figures to make it look worse.<br> Equally, we will never know how many died of Covid rather than with a positive test.<br>The misinformation was appalling</p>— Allison Pearson (@AllisonPearson) <a href="https://twitter.com/AllisonPearson/status/1632084184708661250?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw">March 4, 2023</a></blockquote> <script async src="https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js" charset="utf-8"></script>
If he did, I'm sure you can provide the evidence in your next reply.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wales-Bales
You also seem to be struggling with the word "faked" and it's *inference in the context of this discussion.
*Not to be confused with 'inheritance'.
Attachment 5438Quote:
Originally Posted by Wales-Bales
Disgraceful.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wales-Bales
Not as bad as Collusioners and Hunter Bideners though, apparently.
How can you not understand ***after 3 whole years*** how Covid-19 works?Quote:
Originally Posted by Wales-Bales
Yet you present yourself as an intellectual. Unbelievable.
Depends if you think Biden being in charge of the White House is a good thing or not.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tito Fuente
He's only better than the alternative being Donald Trump.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wales-Bales
https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/202...cock-whatsapp/Quote:
Originally Posted by Wales-Bales
Project Fear’ authors discussed when to ‘deploy’ new Covid variant
Matt Hancock’s plan to ‘frighten the pants off’ the public to ensure compliance with lockdown measures exposed in leaked WhatsApp messages
"Didn't the inventor of the PCR tests say they weren't suitable for diagnosing viral infections, or something to that effect"
Will we have this evidence tonight? If so, I can wait. If not, I'll just read it tomorrow.
I'm just giving examples of what is coming out from accredited national media, yet you want to silence some bloke on a football message board :sherlock:Quote:
Originally Posted by Tito Fuente
He's tanked the US economy and is on the verge of WW3.Quote:
Originally Posted by Tito Fuente