https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xzDghgVSGCw
Printable View
I think the Bishop at the inauguration church service said it all.
https://youtu.be/5ESheItSWy4?si=7YiOsQbeGWNkfgQT
But I cannot support these off the top of my head:
Withdrawal from WHO
Withdrawal from the Paris agreement
Scrapping EDI policies
Policy on free speech that facilitates misinformation and hatred
Oh, and not to mention those pardons for the "J6 hostages"
This points you have raised are in respect of a leader of another country though so why get so entangled in another countries affairs as it doesn’t affect the UK.
How much use is the WHO ?
What is wrong with withdrawing from yet another useless climate change policy?
EDI policy is wrong but it’s not us
How much misinformation does our own government give out ?
Pardons for J6 not great but our own government continues to support other regimes that are doing the same
Except it does though thanks to our "special relationship" with the good, old, US of A, especially as they seem to be taking a lot of interest in our politics lately. As we are an ally, we are seen as complicit in a lot of their actions by the rest of the world. It's time to keep our distance.
We have a free trade deal with the EU.
What do you want? Them to determine our laws again?
That seems a strange move given we apparently have a far-right govt in Italy, Poland and Hungary and another about to come into place in Austria and the EU parliament has been Conservative led for 20 years. Why would someone fearful of the US presidents supposed influence want to grant real power to those?
Maybe because it would 'grant real power' to the UK to influence the future direction of Europe? If not the UK government, then parts of UK civil society and NGOs.
'They' didn't do to us in the EU. 'We' did to us and to 'them'. It is a two-way street. If only you had a more balanced view of the world James, you would see that.
As an aside the only two 'western' leaders of major states to take part in Cop 29 in Baku were Kier Starmer and Giorgia Meloni. She is certainly the head of one of Europe's right wing governments, but despite her roots in the politics of Mussolini she is not in lock step with Trump on climate - nor on some other big issues.
I didnt say we had no influence over the EU. We did. But they had more influence over us. I am balanced on it, I was pondering where people outraged at Trump would have us go? One suggestion is China (which has a far worse human rights record even if no one cares about that anymore) and the EU, which closer ties would almost certainly mean ceding power to them over our laws. It's not very logical.
Our laws are set by us now. A left of centre govt elected by the British people. What's to object to?
Talking of environmental issues, this is an interesting topic;
https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/ce323q4kej1o
You are right on Meloni, but she was never far-right to begin with. That was just more clickbait crap that unfortunately we see a lot of now.
Did Robinson just do a Nazi salute after his goal ?
Musk? He is just a bundle of non-Nazi laughs he is!
Attachment 6412
Anyone fancy doing Musk’s “gesture” a few times over in the middle of town or in their workplace?
If not, why not?
Why wouldn’t it?
The world is full of anti Semites (some of them neo-Nazis) who have strong links to Israel and claim to be Zionists.
Try Viktor Orban, the Afrikaans leadership of apartheid South Africa, Tommy Robinson or the US white supremacist Richard Spencer (who describes himself as a White Zionist).
Zionists are mainly not Jewish. Many Jewish people are anti Zionist (and the % is growing again - especially in the USA).
Since long before the Balfour Declaration European and American anti Semites have supported the Zionist project - to remove Jews from their towns and cities, for strategic political reasons (a client state in the Middle East) or because they are Old Testament literalists who have a racist and reactionary view of their deity’s supposed deal with his chosen people.
The political right support Israel and Musk is totally at home in that toxic place.
Keep up.
A nazi is someone who wants an inquiry into child grooming, someone who thinks Israel deserves to exist and someone who their opponent doesn't want to debate with anymore so they use it as a get out clause.
It is also a member of the now defunct NSDAP German National Socialist Workers Party, who haven't been taking members for 80 years now, but why let the truth get in the way of a good story!?
Musk on tour!
https://www.theguardian.com/technolo...astern-germany
Each day it's getting a bit harder to fight that corner, isn't it?
https://www.politico.com/news/2025/0...eidel-00200620
No it isn't. That's what a Nazi is.
Surely you don't think Germans now should keep apologizing for crimes from 80 years ago? In which case every country would be apologizing for all of their history wouldnt they?
I'm something of a Germanophile, inch liebe Deutchsland, and in my experience they are extremely aware of the grotesque crimes that happened in the past. More so than some countries tbh.
You are correct that words should be used carefully.
Sometimes they are used very loosely - which annoys me. Words have meanings. There may be some scope to argue over the meaning but in these cases (across the political and social spectrum) they are too often just adopted as labels of abuse.
However, you and James and the Tommy Hipster (and Life On Mars when he was with us) go to the other extreme - and (Musk-like) deny any validity to thoughtfully used words that define political ideology or practice. You gut the language of meaning by denial instead of over-use. Just as bad!
Rightly or wrongly, Musk is addressing the German people because he thinks the only other outcome will be a totalitarian AI surveillance state, and yes, it really is that simple.
BTW, if you mean Russia collusion, Hunter Biden Laptop, and the wet market covid origin, then I plead guilty!