Quote Originally Posted by RonnieBird View Post
I think we're back to square one and starting the cycle all over again. Last three years wasted really, and the poster who said we're not a big club at this level is now correct I'm afraid .
We seem to be playing the standard championship tactics now, and I expect we'll do that as well as anyone else - some wins , some losses and the occasional winning streak, but without a specific and unique system it won't get promotion .
It'll be more entertaining to watch in many ways, which is what many here have demanded, so perhaps they'll enjoy it more than winning anything.
Of course, I hope I'm completely wrong about all this, but I doubt it really, and the question arises of how long we'll bounce around the mid table before we either get relegated or play to win.
I understand the sentiment I really do, but it's posts like these that made me create the thread. Why are we making these assumptions after the bloke has been in charge for little over a week? I am among the mass who had umpteen names in mind before Harris but now that he's appointed I will give him the chance and back him as anybody deserves at least that? Like I said you make good points, but only if that ever comes to fruition.

If after some time and a transfer window (whether he's actually given funds is another thing) it's obvious there isn't a marked improvement then I will be with you in saying probably we got the appointment wrong but until then what's the bloke done to not have our backing? Ralls/Morrison/Glatzel/Ward/Whyte are out, and the squad have had one way of playing ingrained in them for the last 3 seasons so let's give him some time is all I'm saying.