Quote Originally Posted by JamesWales View Post
No I get it, and I've said numerous times he should have resigned. I don't think it's juicy, because whilst I agree with you in many respects, the indescretions fundementally are in any time of history very trivial. I just don't have an enormous issue with people who had to work together having a cake or whatever before a meeting. It was wrong, but I'm not that bothered by it and we are just talking about the same damned thing.

What absolutely f****d me over was lockdown and WFH. What worries me is the absense of recognition of how bad that is for mental health and I do hear more recognition of that from him rather than from Starmer.

We are just going round in circles really. The Tories are damaging themselves more by him staying anyway
The guy in charge of implementing the lockdowns but didn't stick to his rules and repeatedly lied about it in Parliament (this seems to be the part that you have repeatedly, conveniently ignored) gets a pass from you because he has, apparently, given more recognition to how much damage lockdown and WFH has caused for people's mental health than his opponent.

Can you explain why this recognition has helped you?

All 10s from the judges for your performance in the mental gymnastics on this topic, James.