Originally Posted by
dml1954
If, as I suspect will happen, City have a strong case for negligence against the broker or insurance company for not insuring Sala from the time of his becoming a City player (which has so far been decided by the Courts took place BEFORE he died), then there are going to be a number of people who have contributed to this thread who are made to look pretty stupid and extremely vindictive for making comments about Tan and employees of the club whilst knowing absolutely nothing about the circumstances of the case and the legal arguments. Some of the things stated in this thread are borderline libellous against the club. How anyone can hate an organisation so much whilst at the same time claiming to still be a fan is beyond me. What we are witnessing is an insurance broker and insurance company wriggling and thrashing around trying to do and say anything to get out of coughing up the insurance money (of course they would never do something like that would they !!) yet all certain people do is blame the club, as if they were directly responsible for killing Sala or any of the other circumstances around his death. If you bought a product off someone and it was damaged or destroyed in transit and could never be used, would you pay up for it anyway or not try to get your money back for it - apparently not according to some people.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote