Quote Originally Posted by jon1959 View Post
Another change of subject? Is that because your beliefs and arguments are built on sandy ground?

Given up on claiming atheists (even ‘top atheists’ whatever they are) are agnostics?

Given up on claiming lack of faith or religion is proof of faith or religion?

Given up on claiming the Old Testament is literally true because it says so in the Old Testament?

Given up on claiming up is down, left is right, or that cultural heritage proves that people (not just your fellow cultists) believe in magic?

However, I think The Guardian is right in that quote. There is more historical evidence of a minor prophet called (in modern translation) Jesus than there is of a single Romano British warlord called Arthur.

No evidence of magic for either of them - but maybe some similarities in the way their myth was expanded and changed over time.
Sure, whenever people read "The historical evidence..............is both long-established and widespread" they immediately think they are reading about a myth