Quote Originally Posted by truthpaste View Post
What lightweight attempt at serious dialogue is this> "faith or science; real Christians v claiming anyone whose grandmother held a rosary" - if that's the level of your understanding and/ or engagement then I'd rather spend my time engaging those held by the Watchtower.

I have sufficient discussions with those who are brave enough and wise enough to engage people with respect, who deserve to have my time more than people who are too lazy to form a world view, have no foundation, no idea and therefore no hope.
Good grief - you really do have a problem with joined up thinking, don't you.

I was not offering you 'serious dialogue', I was pointing out two examples of your inherent contradictions that I had already given you, but you were unable to recognise. Why - who knows. Who cares?

You live in a closed space of circular arguments, language that loses all meaning as it constantly refers back to a book of parables and fables as if they were historical fact (talking snakes, 1000 year old Noah and all the rest that you take literally!) and deep confusion.

In the middle of all that you have ignored the examples of contradiction I have given you. If you are too frit to engage with those, why do you expect me to engage with you - any more than I (unfortunately) have done already?

If you promise to take your infantile nonsense somewhere else, to people who 'deserve to have (your) time' then great. Their suffering will be vast, but it will save me (and presumably others on this board) from your incontinent, lame-brained, gibberish. Result!