
Originally Posted by
the other bob wilson
Hang on a sec, Colwill became a subject in another thread because I didn't mention him in it? How does that one work out? What happened is that you jumped to what was a wrong conclusion about my opinion of Colwill - I made it clear on my blog and in a later post in the thread you refer to what I thought of Colwill's recent performances.
As for this thread, sorry for being "sanctimonious", but I struggle to see why Colwill should be a discussion point in a match thread on a game where he came on for just the dying minutes and had little effect, good or bad, on proceedings.