+ Visit Cardiff FC for Latest News, Transfer Gossip, Fixtures and Match Results |
Oh well, what have we got to lose? Let's just do it anyway!Research published in 2018 suggested that artificially cooling Earth could destroy our planet if the process is abruptly stopped.
A study found that if the aerosol approach is attempted and then suddenly halted, the planet could warm 10 times faster than normal.
Experts have previously warned the technique is a 'risky strategy' that could wreak havoc on our weather patterns, triggering severe droughts or devastating cyclones.
The study from Rutgers University in New Jersey found that suddenly halting so-called 'solar geoengineering' would have severe impacts on our climate.
The stoppage would drastically accelerate climate change, with severe consequences for the planet's wildlife, researchers said.
'Rapid warming after stopping geoengineering would be a huge threat to the natural environment and biodiversity,' study coauthor Professor Alan Robock said.
'If geoengineering ever stopped abruptly, it would be devastating, so you would have to be sure that it could be stopped gradually, and it is easy to think of scenarios that would prevent that.
'Imagine large droughts or floods around the world that could be blamed on geoengineering, and demands that it stop. Can we ever risk that?'
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencet...l-warming.html
99% of the CCMB massive will be hiding under the bed 22C
bollocks.jpg
And it was Organ Morgan who was OTT about things geographical.
watched this earlier always been a hot topic whatever your view point
What's the weather like where you are?
— Sonia Poulton (@SoniaPoulton) April 24, 2025
It's grey and murky here but at least in the UK they've given up any pretence that they are not engineering our weather.
Legacy media came out in lockstep this week to tell us the UK Govt is funding geoengineering experiments.
We know,… pic.twitter.com/rwYpajnnkO
Just caught up with that Daily Mail piece.
Assuming it is accurate (maybe a big assumption) what are the reasons for objecting to, or mocking, experiments to find ways of reducing global warming? The consequences of continued inadequate action will be immense. Testing out option seems sensible to me.
more specifically, there have been a number of similar headlines over the last year or two that have ended up getting large numbers of hits, as typically an American on social media will come across this and post it with a caption like
"your average brit wouldn't survive 10 minutes in Texas mid summer" or something along those lines, which will be followed by a bunch of British accounts arguing back - hey presto; easy engagement farming for the social media account and thousands more views of the article meaning more advertising revenue.
Indeed. There's money to be made in posting crap online and waiting for the responses to come rolling in, whether it be regarding poor bricklaying, politics, culture wars or 'How many of these 20 things have you done?' The respondents don't seem to realise that they have been had.
https://www.metoffice.gov.uk/about-u...ions-next-week
Despite media speculation, next weeks conditions are likely to fall just outside of official Met Office heatwave thresholds. However, this shouldnt lead to any disappointment as many can anticipate a very fine spell of weather with temperatures reaching 27C during the middle of the week.
Who to believe? The Met Office or the Mirror? Tough one boys.
here's a few subject matter experts giving there view about spraying aerosols into the stratosphere 2 hours long mind !
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rf78rEAJvhY