Quote Originally Posted by J R Hartley View Post
Depends which way you read it. I read that as if he plays enough games that they have an obligation to buy then its a 1.3m fee all in. 10% of which goes to his previous club. It says in same article we paid 1.7m for him. So thats a half million pound loss not including agents fees,wages we have paid him etc.etc

So yeah, claiming we are going to make a profit on him is nonsense.
Do you actually think the football club paid £1.7 m for him when he didn’t play a single game , if so that’s insane and not what I was told. Just to reiterate, I’m not in the know, but at least it makes the current deal more likely that the club came out of the whole process with something that resembles a decent return on a car crash of a transfer.