Re: Hitler.
Yes thanks for that, we can learn a lot from every generation, and also appreciate how much easier we have it in comparison.
I envy the fact that so many more knew the Lord in those days, so it must have been so much easier having a 'normal' conversation about matters outside this brief existence in time. I feel that way when I meet many people from Africa (for example), as they are able to talk about faith as casually as we do the weather, with no sign of a nose bleed!
As for your comments on character and our approach to those who are seeking reliable answers in the fog of war, politics, materialism, lust and vanity, then one guy I work alongside on our leadership team is very much like yourself, measured and much less confrontational than I often am. I suppose I see him as the 'John' and I am more the 'Peter', though I don't have a collection of ears in my freezer
I just feel that if someone wishes to sweep their hand (like dismissing an email on their mobile) at what Christian's believe, then they should at least have two things; firstly a good reason for why they think otherwise, and secondly their reason for dismissing the claims of Christ including His Resurrection, particularly given the irrefutable evidence.
I have chosen to work on the 'front line' for just over 40 years, discussing key matters with (for example) Muslims, Jehovah's Witnesses, Mormons, Religious Protestants, Catholics (R), open minded Agnostics, and of course the more common close minded Agnostics.
Each of them have a position on Christ, even if it's only His Name on their angry lips.
Of course many would assume I have blazing arguments with these people, but with the exception of a few over-heated 'religious christians', I end up having a mutually enjoyable time with the majority, often exchanging email addresses for further correspondance or arranging to meet regularly to talk things through properly. One such retired JW couple I have met on and off since 2018.
Originally posted by Gofer Blue
View Post
I envy the fact that so many more knew the Lord in those days, so it must have been so much easier having a 'normal' conversation about matters outside this brief existence in time. I feel that way when I meet many people from Africa (for example), as they are able to talk about faith as casually as we do the weather, with no sign of a nose bleed!
As for your comments on character and our approach to those who are seeking reliable answers in the fog of war, politics, materialism, lust and vanity, then one guy I work alongside on our leadership team is very much like yourself, measured and much less confrontational than I often am. I suppose I see him as the 'John' and I am more the 'Peter', though I don't have a collection of ears in my freezer

I just feel that if someone wishes to sweep their hand (like dismissing an email on their mobile) at what Christian's believe, then they should at least have two things; firstly a good reason for why they think otherwise, and secondly their reason for dismissing the claims of Christ including His Resurrection, particularly given the irrefutable evidence.
I have chosen to work on the 'front line' for just over 40 years, discussing key matters with (for example) Muslims, Jehovah's Witnesses, Mormons, Religious Protestants, Catholics (R), open minded Agnostics, and of course the more common close minded Agnostics.
Each of them have a position on Christ, even if it's only His Name on their angry lips.
Of course many would assume I have blazing arguments with these people, but with the exception of a few over-heated 'religious christians', I end up having a mutually enjoyable time with the majority, often exchanging email addresses for further correspondance or arranging to meet regularly to talk things through properly. One such retired JW couple I have met on and off since 2018.

Comment