Tweet
Re: Charlie Kirk
I personally think it's far less grey than some people wish to think. We are solidly on Ethics territory now and I believe (surpassing all religions) there is an ethical compass which is innate to all homo sapiens. The issue is there will always be the tiny minority who have divergent views.
These rules more than often serve a practical purpose apart from a purely moral one. An example would be murder: if it were not ethically and legally frowned upon, human civilization and existence would be at placed at incalculable risk!
Your last point is moot and of course subject to collaborative analysis so I really am open on it until explored in depth. Clearly the views of physiologists and psychologists would be extremely important. On the other hand, would you support a pretty glaring example whereby someone tours colleges and schools promoting a reduction in the age of consent by 10 years?
Originally posted by Taunton Blue Genie
View Post
These rules more than often serve a practical purpose apart from a purely moral one. An example would be murder: if it were not ethically and legally frowned upon, human civilization and existence would be at placed at incalculable risk!
Your last point is moot and of course subject to collaborative analysis so I really am open on it until explored in depth. Clearly the views of physiologists and psychologists would be extremely important. On the other hand, would you support a pretty glaring example whereby someone tours colleges and schools promoting a reduction in the age of consent by 10 years?
Comment