ARTEMIS II

[stevo]

Re: ARTEMIS II

Really?

[poc]

Re: ARTEMIS II

dont forget 50 years ago they went and got back in a empty heinz beans tin with a 50 cc engine:hehe:

[Taunton Blue Genie]

Re: ARTEMIS II

I think it has, what is it 275,000 miles to the moon? Then back? The average jet engine plane flies for what 12 hrs back in the 70’s? 2000 miles max? Hhmmmmmm mmm
Never given it much thought before but the more I think about it and the dodgy images of them on the moon, it does look like a film set from James Bond.

Planes need to be propelled the whole time due to the Earth's gravity and various types of resistance which don't apply in space.

Best give such things a bit more thought before you doubt them.

[delmbox]

Re: ARTEMIS II

A bullet does ~3,000 km/h.
NASA says these guys hit Earth at 40,000 km/h — that’s 10+ bullets stacked together… but somehow slow down using parachutes and land safely in the ocean Uber Boat style?
So a bullet shreds flesh instantly but a human in a metal flask can hit the atmosphere at 10× that speed, turn into a flying fireball, lose signal, cook the outside to hell and still land like it’s a beach holiday?
But yeah… “trust the heat shield.”

Are they going to upload their own the mobile phone footage of the Sun ,the stars solar system, the re entry and splashdown ?

hey don't believe any of it if you want, nobody cares!

[stevo]

Re: ARTEMIS II

I think it has, what is it 275,000 miles to the moon? Then back? The average jet engine plane flies for what 12 hrs back in the 70’s? 2000 miles max? Hhmmmmmm mmm
Never given it much thought before but the more I think about it and the dodgy images of them on the moon, it does look like a film set from James Bond.

In what way are the images dodgy?

[stevo]

Re: ARTEMIS II

hey don't believe any of it if you want, nobody cares!

This is of course the correct response

[Bluebird Karen]

Re: ARTEMIS II

hey don't believe any of it if you want, nobody cares!

Why bother replying then , if nobody cares :hehe:

How old are you 60 to 70 years of age, no doubt probably watched the first “moon landing “ so you’re probably a bit different to the majority of people these days judging by the general consensus.

[stevo]

Re: ARTEMIS II

Why bother replying then , if nobody cares :hehe:

How old are you 60 to 70 years of age, no doubt probably watched the first “moon landing “ so you’re probably a bit different to the majority of people these days judging by the general consensus.

Do you think the Earth is flat too?

[Bluebird Karen]

Re: ARTEMIS II

Why is it a small number of highly active users continue to drive a large share of the conversation. The minority of users like shaping the narrative or steering debates, no wonder this board is pathetic compared to others.

The whole event feels like a “charade” and lacks authenticity—like the performance involving Katy Perry and her friends.

[stevo]

Re: ARTEMIS II

Then perhaps this board isn't for you.

[Bluebird Karen]

Re: ARTEMIS II

Then perhaps this board isn't for you.

:hehe:

[Heathblue]

Re: ARTEMIS II

:hehe:

I think you are doing fine Karen, anyone who dares an opinion which isn't a a Guardian or BBC narrative is subjected to the mass criminal commie loving piles on. 🤣

[delmbox]

Re: ARTEMIS II

Why bother replying then , if nobody cares :hehe:

How old are you 60 to 70 years of age, no doubt probably watched the first “moon landing “ so you’re probably a bit different to the majority of people these days judging by the general consensus.

I was a couple of decades away from being born when the first moon landing happened ta, I'm an absolute spring chicken on this board.

I just mean there are gifted and intelligent people who accomplish incredible things and people like you can go "oh you expect us to believe THAT?" if you want but the truth is nope, not really, the majority of people appreciate it and it doesn't matter if you do or not.

You and the rest of the "I don't understand with my O Level C in physics how that is possible therefore it must be made up" crew can sneer from the sidelines as much as you want, you make no difference to any of it! The achievements will continue!

[Bluebird Karen]

Re: ARTEMIS II

I was a couple of decades away from being born when the first moon landing happened ta, I'm an absolute spring chicken on this board.

I just mean there are gifted and intelligent people who accomplish incredible things and people like you can go "oh you expect us to believe THAT?" if you want but the truth is nope, not really, the majority of people appreciate it and it doesn't matter if you do or not.

You and the rest of the "I don't understand with my O Level C in physics how that is possible therefore it must be made up" crew can sneer from the sidelines as much as you want, you make no difference to any of it! The achievements will continue!

That’s fair enough, people don’t always need to justify their views, and it’s normal to stand by what you believe.

At the same time, it’s usually worth staying a little open to new information or different perspectives. Not because you have to change your mind, but because it helps you sharpen your thinking.

[Canton Kev]

Re: ARTEMIS II

A bullet does ~3,000 km/h.
NASA says these guys hit Earth at 40,000 km/h — that’s 10+ bullets stacked together… but somehow slow down using parachutes and land safely in the ocean Uber Boat style?
So a bullet shreds flesh instantly but a human in a metal flask can hit the atmosphere at 10× that speed, turn into a flying fireball, lose signal, cook the outside to hell and still land like it’s a beach holiday?
But yeah… “trust the heat shield.”

Are they going to upload their own the mobile phone footage of the Sun ,the stars solar system, the re entry and splashdown ?

Ohhhh

You’re not conspiracy theory stupid. You’re just generally stupid.