ARTEMIS II

[Bluebird Karen]

Re: ARTEMIS II

Ohhhh

You’re not conspiracy theory stupid. You’re just generally stupid.

I replied to offer an explanation to the original post not to trade insults which means I’m not going to engage in back-and-forth personal attacks especially with high volume posters like yourself . It doesn’t help solve anything, and it usually just derails the conversation further.

Why don’t you offer an alternative explanation to what I posted ?

There are plenty of things that are unclear to people about this choreographed mission.

[poc]

Re: ARTEMIS II

I replied to offer an explanation to the original post not to trade insults which means I’m not going to engage in back-and-forth personal attacks especially with high volume posters like yourself . It doesn’t help solve anything, and it usually just derails the conversation further.

Why don’t you offer an alternative explanation to what I posted ?

There are plenty of things that are unclear to people about this choreographed mission.

good luck on this forum with all the tinfoil hat brigade :thumbup:

[Taunton Blue Genie]

Re: ARTEMIS II

I replied to offer an explanation to the original post not to trade insults which means I’m not going to engage in back-and-forth personal attacks especially with high volume posters like yourself . It doesn’t help solve anything, and it usually just derails the conversation further.

Why don’t you offer an alternative explanation to what I posted ?

There are plenty of things that are unclear to people about this choreographed mission.

Your post did seem to ask some questions that you could have easily have found answers to had you done some very basic research online. Whether you intended it or not, it came over as if you disbelieve the science but without understanding what you were actually dismissing.
Such a stance is usually associated with people who eschew well-documented science but are gullible regarding conspiracy theories.

[Bluebird Karen]

Re: ARTEMIS II

Your post did seem to ask some questions that you could have easily have found answers to had you done some very basic research online. Whether you intended it or not, it came over as if you disbelieve the science but without understanding what you were actually dismissing.
Such a stance is usually associated with people who eschew well-documented science but are gullible regarding conspiracy theories.

:thumbup:

If it was me , I’d have footage of the stars and the Galaxy on route especially when approaching the other side of the moon , before the signal gets cut.

Instead we get what appears to be underwhelming images

[Taunton Blue Genie]

Re: ARTEMIS II

:thumbup:

If it was me , I’d have footage of the stars and the Galaxy on route especially when approaching the other side of the moon , before the signal gets cut.

Instead we get what appears to be underwhelming images

I can understand why you are struggling with many of the concepts involved.

[delmbox]

Re: ARTEMIS II

https://www.popsci.com/science/artemis-ii-video/