The Donald Trump thread

[cyril evans awaydays]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

The evidence is inside the laptop, but the desire to investigate it is not so great . Sorry for having to point out the obvious. It's best to stick with the boys from CNN & Co if you are so easily confused.

I only asked for the evidence you like to say you always rely upon when concluding that the media dismissed whatever you are alluding to as a conspiracy theory so we can see if there is now any more credibility. If you haven't got the evidence or the courage of your convictions to say what needs investigating and move beyond innuendo or "it's on the laptop" then no biggie!

[lardy]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

Rudy Glueyani here always crumbles under the slightest questioning.

[Wales-Bales]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

I only asked for the evidence you like to say you always rely upon when concluding that the media dismissed whatever you are alluding to as a conspiracy theory so we can see if there is now any more credibility. If you haven't got the evidence or the courage of your convictions to say what needs investigating and move beyond innuendo or "it's on the laptop" then no biggie!

The evidence is in the OIG report. What becomes of it is anybody's guess.

[lardy]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

That Michael Cohen audio is interesting. Trump seemed to be very casually chatting about paying off women, almost as if it wasn't a one (or two or three) off.

Does he seem worried that Cohen will flip? You betcha...

[Wales-Bales]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

That Michael Cohen audio is interesting. Trump seemed to be very casually chatting about paying off women, almost as if it wasn't a one (or two or three) off.

Does he seem worried that Cohen will flip? You betcha...

It's now or never, they won't have a better chance after the Russia Collusion and Stormy Daniels failures

[Heisenberg]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

I wouldn't expect you to have a clue at any point.

Hahaha!

Here's how it went guys...

WB posted a page of a document asking for an explanation of it without telling me what exactly it was that he wanted me to explain. He might as well have posted a page of Nigella's cookbook and said "explain this!!!" ... Do you want to know how to prepare the recipe correctly? Do you want me to explain what type of cuisine it is? Do you want me to explain what cooking is?

Counter from me asking if he can explain it as he was the one who posted it and I wasn't sure what he was trying to prove.

WB responded by saying a lot, but without saying anything. Without giving any detail about why this particular page of the document was important and what point he was trying to make in regards to it.

I kindly explained what each note on the page is related to, hoping this would provide a response as to where this was all going.

WB Responded in riddles again, which are now becoming so vague (even for him) it becomes impossible to know what he was trying to prove and leaves another poster wondering if he even knows.

Asked by another poster to clarify what his point was and provide sources, which is something that he claims he is capable of doing to back up all of his statements/opinions.

WB responded by saying something vague again and saying the sources are no longer available. Then proceeded to tell the posters how obvious his point is and that they are idiots for not understanding... But not once in this entire charade getting close to explaining what the f**k this was all about.


There we have his M.O. - Avoid, riddle, deflect and repeat. Which, previously in this thread, is how I described every interaction with him will turn out and why I suggested that I'm surprised people still entertain him. I will revert back to my voyeuristic role again. Have fun guys.

[Heisenberg]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

^^^^^^ Over to you Heisenberg, if you are going to come on here making fanciful claims, it's time to roll up your sleeves and prove them. I've helped you out by giving you access to all the source documents the media work from, (excluding documents that are leaked to colluding journalists). Your task is a simple one, you merely have to show where the above analysis in incorrect, hence proving your conspiracy theory statement.

...

[Wales-Bales]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

First person to spot the disparity with these quotes wins a bag of Skips and a subscription to Breitbart.

In relation to Democrats being accused of child sex trafficking -

In relation to victims of sexual abuse accusing a high level Republican of covering up the acts commited by his colleague -

...

[Badly Ironed Shirt]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

Trump punches man live on USA National TV

The sort of thing you come across if you leave YOutube running a few hours

[Auntie Andy]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

Trump punches man live on USA National TV

The sort of thing you come across if you leave YOutube running a few hours

Honestly I despair. WTF is happening in the world today.

[Wales-Bales]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

Honestly I despair. WTF is happening in the world today.

Comedy?

[CardiffIrish2]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

I don’t think anyone worse of Trump having seen that.
Fair play some of the Yanks attempt st comedy is utterly cringe worthy as above clip shows

[Wales-Bales]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

I don’t think anyone worse of Trump having seen that.
Fair play some of the Yanks attempt st comedy is utterly cringe worthy as above clip shows

He was actually practising for future trade negotiations with European Commission President Jean-Claude Juncker.

[Wales-Bales]

Re: The Donald Trump thread

A deconstruction of lardy's Trump Russia Collusion conspiracy theory ..

https://amp.washingtontimes.com/news/2018/jul/26/hillary-clinton-used-christopher-steeles-trump-rus/

Our lardy did mention useful idiots the other day, how ironic is that!