GLAMMY

[the other bob wilson]

Re: GLAMMY

Excellent spell by twenty year old Roman Walker, who impresses me every time I see him, of four overs, three for fifteen.

Somerset 101-4 halfway through the fourteenth over.

[Cyncoed Slumdog]

Re: GLAMMY

Dreadful by Douthwaite.

[Pearcey3]

Re: GLAMMY

Excellent spell by twenty year old Roman Walker, who impresses me every time I see him, of four overs, three for fifteen.

Somerset 101-4 halfway through the fourteenth over.

Yep. He has put more experienced bowlers to shame again.

[Pearcey3]

Re: GLAMMY

I really wish the commentators wouldn’t keep on going on about Ingram’s strokeplay. He isn’t worth a place in the side let alone keeping out Neser. Another poor effort tonight using up 3.3 overs for just 19 runs when we need to be scoring at 9 an over.

[Taffy Blue in Berkshire]

Re: GLAMMY

this is pathetic, should be relegated!

[Pearcey3]

Re: GLAMMY

It’s embarrassingl. The bowling was mostly utter dross again with 9 wides and 2 no balls and loads of short stuff and bowling down the leg side. Roman Walker did superbly.
The batting was even worse. We have Ingram back next season. If Maynard continues to play him ahead of Neser I won’t bother.

[Taffy Blue in Berkshire]

Re: GLAMMY

Somerset have been very professional. Excellent bowling, field placing. I blame the Glammy board for employing a poor coaching team and players who continue failing.

[Pearcey3]

Re: GLAMMY

High time Walker was given a chance with the first team. I would rather see him given a chance ahead of Weighell who hasn’t done much at all.

[the other bob wilson]

Re: GLAMMY

High time Walker was given a chance with the first team. I would rather see him given a chance ahead of Weighell who hasn’t done much at all.

I’d definitely give Walker some four day games in September. As for Weighell, I’ve more faith in him (and I don’t have much!) as a batsman than a bowler - I don’t see what he gives us with the ball that the likes of Smith, Carey, Walker and even Dowthwaite couldn’t.

[Pearcey3]

Re: GLAMMY

---

k

I’d definitely give Walker some four day games in September. As for Weighell, I’ve more faith in him (and I don’t have much!) as a batsman than a bowler - I don’t see what he gives us with the ball that the likes of Smith, Carey, Walker and even Dowthwaite couldn’t.

Yep taking on Weighell when we have Walker, Smith and Carey is very poor. He has a new contract for next season too.Walker and Smith don’t. Nor TVG. Recruitment is poor. Baffled why Ingram is back again next season. He was very poor two seasons ago and has been just as bad this time around. He will be being handsomely paid for not being good enough.

[Pearcey3]

Re: GLAMMY

Glammy 184/4. Good innings from Labuschagne, Lloyd and Douthwaite. Ingram the weak link again failing to score at just a run a ball.

[the other bob wilson]

Re: GLAMMY

Four or five years ago, you could make a case for saying that Ingram was the most feared hitter in the domestic T20 game - he’s thirty six now, but I’m not sure that can fully explain his decline in recent years. Watching him today, you could understand Hampshire keeping him in on purpose.

[Pearcey3]

Re: GLAMMY

Four or five years ago, you could make a case for saying that Ingram was the most feared hitter in the domestic T20 game - he’s thirty six now, but I’m not sure that can fully explain his decline in recent years. Watching him today, you could understand Hampshire keeping him in on purpose.

Hants are winning this at a canter. It just emphasises how poor his performance has been. Dreadful that he played today. There has been no intention of trying out Neser even though it should have been done today. The club should try and come to an agreement with Ingram so that he does not return next season or at the very least make clear he won’t be open the starting line up. It has to be performance related.

[fugsyphil]

Re: GLAMMY

Bowling masterclass

[Pearcey3]

Re: GLAMMY

100/0 off 7
Maynard should apologise for this campaign.