Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

GLAMMY

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Re: GLAMMY

    Originally posted by Madassa View Post
    Superb - hope his heroics in defeat inspires others to raise their game.
    They need to. We gave that game away in the last five overs of Glos innings with their lower going at between 12/13 runs a over. We should have been chasing 170 max. If Neser plays ahead of Ingram we win that game tonight. He’s not just a very good bowler. He can bat too.

    Comment


    • Re: GLAMMY

      Lloyd banged 28 off 15. Marcus 93 off 56. Im too pissed to work out exactly what the the rest needed to chip in. But its not much, at just over a run a ball. The best batsman in world cricket tries his heart out every game he plays for us, they just need to front up and support him

      Comment


      • Re: GLAMMY

        The other real joke of planning/coaching was cooke ahead of carlson. Carlson the in form batsman, and more importantly the only other player as quick between the wickets as marnus. Maynard is beyond clueless, he seems to have a magnetic attraction to the wrong decision at every occasion. This is a side to win silverware, hamstrung by a toxic moron in the coaches chair

        Comment


        • Re: GLAMMY

          Watching the high scoring game last night which just went against Glamorgan, the thought occurred to me that the pitch was a lot better than the ones we've seen for at least three of the four four day matches played at Cardiff this season.

          Comment


          • Re: GLAMMY

            Originally posted by chrisp_1927 View Post
            The other real joke of planning/coaching was cooke ahead of carlson. Carlson the in form batsman, and more importantly the only other player as quick between the wickets as marnus. Maynard is beyond clueless, he seems to have a magnetic attraction to the wrong decision at every occasion. This is a side to win silverware, hamstrung by a toxic moron in the coaches chair
            I thought Cooke going ahead was the right call and he did have a decent innings. Carlson is a little flaky and after such a great start to the season is just dropping off.
            I’m fine with Maynard. I don’t think this side is particularly strong. Take out Labuschagne and we would have been bowled out for less than 100

            Comment


            • Re: GLAMMY

              Originally posted by Pearcey3 View Post
              I thought Cooke going ahead was the right call and he did have a decent innings. Carlson is a little flaky and after such a great start to the season is just dropping off.
              I’m fine with Maynard. I don’t think this side is particularly strong. Take out Labuschagne and we would have been bowled out for less than 100
              Might have been talking through my wallet slightly after losing a bet! But I do think there's a decent side there. Carlson looked in good nick, out going for a 6 when the run rate was getting very high. I think carlson and marnus really could have pushed the 2's from early on in the innings.

              Comment


              • Re: GLAMMY

                Originally posted by chrisp_1927 View Post
                Might have been talking through my wallet slightly after losing a bet! But I do think there's a decent side there. Carlson looked in good nick, out going for a 6 when the run rate was getting very high. I think carlson and marnus really could have pushed the 2's from early on in the innings.
                Yep agreed and Lloyd didn’t need to throw his wicket away when we were going along nicely.

                Comment


                • Re: GLAMMY

                  How come the attendance is so pitiful when it is rammed at Edgebaston?

                  Comment


                  • Re: GLAMMY

                    Originally posted by Dave Blue View Post
                    How come the attendance is so pitiful when it is rammed at Edgebaston?
                    Only allowed a 1000 as a test event for the welsh government

                    Comment


                    • Re: GLAMMY

                      Essex 27-1 off four overs.

                      Comment


                      • Re: GLAMMY

                        91-4 off 13 overs.

                        Comment


                        • Re: GLAMMY

                          Lloyd gives his wicket away again. He doesn’t need to try and hit every ball out of the ground especially when they are ahead of the run rate.

                          Comment


                          • Re: GLAMMY

                            Who is this Selman fella, where has he been hiding?

                            Comment


                            • Re: GLAMMY

                              They seem to have moved the start of this week’s games to 5pm. So more difficult to get to after work and clashing directly with Wednesday’s vital game. Do they actually want anyone there?

                              Comment


                              • Re: GLAMMY

                                Originally posted by Dave Blue View Post
                                They seem to have moved the start of this week’s games to 5pm. So more difficult to get to after work and clashing directly with Wednesday’s vital game. Do they actually want anyone there?
                                Problem with one of the floodlights so need to finish earlier

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X