GLAMMY

[the other bob wilson]

Re: GLAMMY

A very encouraging first game all things considered- think it’s reasonable to think we would have won without the delays on the first day.

[Lord Worcester]

Re: GLAMMY

A very encouraging first game all things considered- think it’s reasonable to think we would have won without the delays on the first day.

Very encouraging and gave it a right go with a generous declaration. Taking 17 wickets after losing a day is positive.

[Pearcey3]

Re: GLAMMY

A very encouraging first game all things considered- think it’s reasonable to think we would have won without the delays on the first day.

Very encouraging. We definitely had the better of the game.

[FormerlyJohnnyBreadhead]

Re: GLAMMY

The pessimist in me wonders if that could be a missed opportunity come the end of the season, but in fairness I don't think Carlson could have been any more positive with the declaration. If we'd scored quicker Sun evening/Mon morning, we could have arguably given ourselves 10 more overs to try and bowl them out, but it's hard to be negative.

Thought Hadley had a good debut after a wobbly start; jury's still out on Dickson as a red ball batsman (I see Northeast scored 94 for Kent, incidentally).

Despite taking 17 wickets in 130 odd overs, we're still clearly a pace bowler short, too. Interesting that Nick Webb said Harris took a job offer that came out of the blue, which suggests he left Glammy in the lurch a little bit. Maybe Surrey or one of the other "big" counties have a talented young seamer we can borrow for a bit.

[the other bob wilson]

Re: GLAMMY

The pessimist in me wonders if that could be a missed opportunity come the end of the season, but in fairness I don't think Carlson could have been any more positive with the declaration. If we'd scored quicker Sun evening/Mon morning, we could have arguably given ourselves 10 more overs to try and bowl them out, but it's hard to be negative.

Thought Hadley had a good debut after a wobbly start; jury's still out on Dickson as a red ball batsman (I see Northeast scored 94 for Kent, incidentally).

Despite taking 17 wickets in 130 odd overs, we're still clearly a pace bowler short, too. Interesting that Nick Webb said Harris took a job offer that came out of the blue, which suggests he left Glammy in the lurch a little bit. Maybe Surrey or one of the other "big" counties have a talented young seamer we can borrow for a bit.

I was quite surprised Leonard didn’t play.

[poc]

Re: GLAMMY

you cant ask for a better start, leg stump out the ground first ball notts 0-1

[the other bob wilson]

Re: GLAMMY

Notts 101-5 at lunch - three wickets for Van Der Gugten.

Doesn’t look good dropping your new batsman after just one game mind.

I mentioned Leonard in a previous message, but he won’t be playing until the end of May due to injury and he’s missing all of this first group of four day fixtures.

[Lord Worcester]

Re: GLAMMY

Notts 101-5 at lunch - three wickets for Van Der Gugten.

Doesn’t look good dropping your new batsman after just one game mind.

I mentioned Leonard in a previous message, but he won’t be playing until the end of May due to injury and he’s missing all of this first group of four day fixtures.

I wonder if they have made an early call on Dickson being a white ball cricketer only. Friendly with die hard Somerset fan who was not at all surprised we signed him, but very surprised we selected him for our opening 4 day game back in div 1.

[the other bob wilson]

Re: GLAMMY

Notts 279 all out, four wickets each for Hadley and Van Der Gugten, but Glamorgan struggling at 20-2 in reply.

Kellaway is injured and has been substituted by Dickson.

[Dave Blue]

Re: GLAMMY

Notts 279 all out, four wickets each for Hadley and Van Der Gugten, but Glamorgan struggling at 20-2 in reply.

Kellaway is injured and has been substituted by Dickson.

That's a blow. Will do well to get anything out of this. Hopefully the weather will help.

[Pearcey3]

Re: GLAMMY

Ouch. Losing Carlson at the end of the day means advantage Notts. At 79/4 a lot resting on Ingram.

[rich munn]

Re: GLAMMY

Ouch. Losing Carlson at the end of the day means advantage Notts. At 79/4 a lot resting on Ingram.

Excellent article by Atherton in yesterday's Times - Mason Crane played one Ashes Test match, and had 1 - 190 something, though he "didn't bowl that badly."
Atherton hoping leg-spin is coming back.
So do I!

Glammy 80-4 at the close.

[poc]

Re: GLAMMY

its all going wrong this morning 87-6

[The Bloop]

Re: GLAMMY

92/8 which i guess is effectively 92/9 with Ben Kellaway not being involved

[poc]

Re: GLAMMY

92/8 which i guess is effectively 92/9 with Ben Kellaway not being involved

dickson replaced him as a substitute