GLAMMY

[chrisp_1927]

Re: GLAMMY

Cullen in for Taylor. Attempt to strengthen the batting evidently, Cullen has been in decent form in the 2nds so hopefully he will get a few.

Derbyshire opener Shan Masood has over 600 runs already this season, not a bad start

[chrisp_1927]

Re: GLAMMY

Cullen in for Taylor. Attempt to strengthen the batting evidently, Cullen has been in decent form in the 2nds so hopefully he will get a few.

Derbyshire opener Shan Masood has over 600 runs already this season, not a bad start

[the other bob wilson]

Re: GLAMMY

Great caught and bowled by Hogan to remove Masood for sixty - Hogan was superb in the first session where Glamorgan deserved more than the one wicket.

Derbyshire currently 117-2.

[chrisp_1927]

Re: GLAMMY

Good result getting masood for 60, let's hope we can chip away at the rest now

[the other bob wilson]

Re: GLAMMY

Three quick wickets right at the end of the day helped Glamorgan back into a game which looked like getting away from them, but we need to get the last five wickets pretty quickly and then show a lot more application with the bat than we did last time out if we’re to avoid defeat against a team that has had a big boost in confidence from their new coaching appointment.

[chrisp_1927]

Re: GLAMMY

Three quick wickets right at the end of the day helped Glamorgan back into a game which looked like getting away from them, but we need to get the last five wickets pretty quickly and then show a lot more application with the bat than we did last time out if we’re to avoid defeat against a team that has had a big boost in confidence from their new coaching appointment.

It's a tough one to judge . When they were 276 for 2 we were certainly looking very much in trouble. Their last game at home saw a score of 505-8 declared for Derbyshire, followed by Essex 174 all out and then a massive 513/3 declared. So their could well be an argument that in the context of the pitch , those late 3 wickets make it an absolutely fantastic day for Glamorgan and put us right in the box seat. Hopefully a fired up Hogan and Neser can do a bit more damage early this morning.

[Kind of Blue]

Re: GLAMMY

It's a tough one to judge . When they were 276 for 2 we were certainly looking very much in trouble. Their last game at home saw a score of 505-8 declared for Derbyshire, followed by Essex 174 all out and then a massive 513/3 declared. So their could well be an argument that in the context of the pitch , those late 3 wickets make it an absolutely fantastic day for Glamorgan and put us right in the box seat. Hopefully a fired up Hogan and Neser can do a bit more damage early this morning.

Strange old score in that Sussex combined innings against Derbyshire. Makes me wonder what the highest score posted after a follow on in first class cricket is.

Derbyshire could be a dark horse shout for promotion this season. Feels a fairly strong second division at the moment.

Hopefully we can get them out in the morning session and see how we go on this track.

[the other bob wilson]

Re: GLAMMY

Strange old score in that Sussex combined innings against Derbyshire. Makes me wonder what the highest score posted after a follow on in first class cricket is.

Derbyshire could be a dark horse shout for promotion this season. Feels a fairly strong second division at the moment.

Hopefully we can get them out in the morning session and see how we go on this track.

Not sure if it is the record, but, coincidentally, this year is the centenary of a remarkable county championship which saw Hampshire bowled out for just 15 in reply to Warwickshire’s 223. Hampshire then piled up 521 when asked to follow up and a shell shocked Warwickshire were then dismissed for 158 to lose by 155 runs - Hampshire’s 15 is the lowest ever score by a winning team in a game.

[the other bob wilson]

Re: GLAMMY

Derbyshire 360-8 at lunch, just the two bowling bonus points, but only three batting points for Derby.

[chrisp_1927]

Re: GLAMMY

I'd have taken that at start of play. 3 wickets for 80 runs . Bowlers definitely deserve credit for keeping the run rate at bay, as evidenced by Derbyshire only picking up the 3 bonus points as bob mentions.

Nice to see du plooy gone. He can give it a good smack , so would have been quite dangerous as wickets fell at other end. Would be nice to wrap up these last 2 wickets quickly and then put up a nice quick 400+ score.

[the other bob wilson]

Re: GLAMMY

I'd have taken that at start of play. 3 wickets for 80 runs . Bowlers definitely deserve credit for keeping the run rate at bay, as evidenced by Derbyshire only picking up the 3 bonus points as bob mentions.

Nice to see du plooy gone. He can give it a good smack , so would have been quite dangerous as wickets fell at other end. Would be nice to wrap up these last 2 wickets quickly and then put up a nice quick 400+ score.

The first bit done, Derbyshire 368 all out, which is very good from 276-2 - can’t help thinking the second part will be more difficult.

[chrisp_1927]

Re: GLAMMY

The first bit done, Derbyshire 368 all out, which is very good from 276-2 - can’t help thinking the second part will be more difficult.

Made a good start, but still a long way to go. Got a good feeling about this game mind

[TWGL1]

Re: GLAMMY

Made a good start, but still a long way to go. Got a good feeling about this game mind

50* for Lloyd

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/cricket/scorecard/ECKO53025

91-0

[Kind of Blue]

Re: GLAMMY

What a daft run out.